BCFS.DE vs. AW1C.DE

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BCFS.DE (UBS US Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF hEUR Acc) and AW1C.DE (UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) are both exchange-traded funds - BCFS.DE is a Options Trading fund tracking the US Equity Defensive Put Write (EUR Hedged) Index, while AW1C.DE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500® ESG Elite. Both are passively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BCFS.DE charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for AW1C.DE.

Performance

BCFS.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS US Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF hEUR Acc (BCFS.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (AW1C.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCFS.DE achieves a 4.05% return, which is significantly lower than AW1C.DE's 21.25% return.

BCFS.DE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.91%
• YTD: 4.05%
• 6M: 4.67%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AW1C.DE

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 13.12%
• YTD: 21.25%
• 6M: 23.39%
• 1Y: 39.82%
• 3Y*: 21.37%
• 5Y*: 15.81%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCFS.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BCFS.DE UBS US Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF hEUR Acc	4.05%	4.64%
AW1C.DE UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc	21.25%	11.38%

Correlation

The correlation between BCFS.DE and AW1C.DE is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2025	0.48

Return for Risk

BCFS.DE vs. AW1C.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AW1C.DE

AW1C.DE Risk / Return Rank: 51
AW1C.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
AW1C.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
AW1C.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 81
AW1C.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
AW1C.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCFS.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS US Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF hEUR Acc (BCFS.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (AW1C.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BCFS.DE	AW1C.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.57	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.85	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.96	0.92	+2.04

Drawdowns

BCFS.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCFS.DE drawdown since its inception was -2.21%, smaller than the maximum AW1C.DE drawdown of -22.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCFS.DE and AW1C.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCFS.DE	AW1C.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.21%	-22.40%	+20.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-16.86%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.40%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.18%	0.00%	-0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.17%	-5.82%	+5.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	8.90%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BCFS.DE	AW1C.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.82%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.14%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.66%	25.28%	-21.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.66%	18.35%	-14.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.66%	18.12%	-14.46%

BCFS.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCFS.DE has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than AW1C.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BCFS.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither BCFS.DE nor AW1C.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCFS.DE and AW1C.DE in my portfolio?

BCFS.DE and AW1C.DE have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BCFS.DE or AW1C.DE?

On fees, AW1C.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCFS.DE or AW1C.DE?

AW1C.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for BCFS.DE.

What is the main difference between BCFS.DE and AW1C.DE?

BCFS.DE is categorized as Options Trading, while AW1C.DE is S&P 500. BCFS.DE tracks US Equity Defensive Put Write (EUR Hedged) Index, while AW1C.DE tracks S&P 500® ESG Elite. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for BCFS.DE and 0.15% for AW1C.DE.