PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCFS.DE vs. 4UBF.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCFS.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS US Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF hEUR Acc (BCFS.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (4UBF.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCFS.DE achieves a 4.05% return, which is significantly higher than 4UBF.DE's 0.61% return.


BCFS.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.91%
YTD
4.05%
6M
4.67%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

4UBF.DE

1D
-0.28%
1M
0.83%
YTD
0.61%
6M
-0.10%
1Y
1.69%
3Y*
4.82%
5Y*
-0.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCFS.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BCFS.DE and 4UBF.DE is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2025

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCFS.DE vs. 4UBF.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCFS.DE

4UBF.DE
4UBF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
4UBF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
4UBF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
4UBF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
4UBF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
4UBF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCFS.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS US Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF hEUR Acc (BCFS.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (4UBF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BCFS.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BCFS.DE4UBF.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.96

-0.05

+3.01

Drawdowns

BCFS.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCFS.DE drawdown since its inception was -2.21%, smaller than the maximum 4UBF.DE drawdown of -19.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCFS.DE and 4UBF.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCFS.DE4UBF.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.21%

-19.99%

+17.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-2.92%

+2.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.17%

-8.54%

+8.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.87%

Volatility

BCFS.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCFS.DE4UBF.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.66%

3.68%

-0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.66%

5.08%

-1.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.66%

5.02%

-1.36%

BCFS.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCFS.DE has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than 4UBF.DE's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BCFS.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither BCFS.DE nor 4UBF.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BCFS.DE and 4UBF.DE have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 4UBF.DE is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

4UBF.DE is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for BCFS.DE.

BCFS.DE is categorized as Options Trading, while 4UBF.DE is European Corporate Bonds. BCFS.DE tracks US Equity Defensive Put Write (EUR Hedged) Index, while 4UBF.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for BCFS.DE and 0.13% for 4UBF.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCFS.DE and 4UBF.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer