BCFS.DE vs. 4UBF.DE
BCFS.DE (UBS US Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF hEUR Acc) and 4UBF.DE (UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - BCFS.DE is a Options Trading fund tracking the US Equity Defensive Put Write (EUR Hedged) Index, while 4UBF.DE is a European Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable. Both are passively managed. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BCFS.DE charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for 4UBF.DE.
Performance
BCFS.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCFS.DE achieves a 4.05% return, which is significantly higher than 4UBF.DE's 0.61% return.
BCFS.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- 4.05%
- 6M
- 4.67%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
4UBF.DE
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 0.83%
- YTD
- 0.61%
- 6M
- -0.10%
- 1Y
- 1.69%
- 3Y*
- 4.82%
- 5Y*
- -0.25%
- 10Y*
- —
BCFS.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BCFS.DE UBS US Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF hEUR Acc | 4.05% | 4.64% |
4UBF.DE UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc | 0.61% | 0.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCFS.DE and 4UBF.DE is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2025 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCFS.DE vs. 4UBF.DE — Risk / Return Rank
BCFS.DE
4UBF.DE
BCFS.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS US Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF hEUR Acc (BCFS.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (4UBF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCFS.DE | 4UBF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.96 | -0.05 | +3.01 |
Drawdowns
BCFS.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCFS.DE drawdown since its inception was -2.21%, smaller than the maximum 4UBF.DE drawdown of -19.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCFS.DE and 4UBF.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCFS.DE | 4UBF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.21% | -19.99% | +17.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -2.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.18% | -2.92% | +2.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.17% | -8.54% | +8.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.87% | — |
Volatility
BCFS.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCFS.DE | 4UBF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.33% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.11% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.66% | 3.68% | -0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.66% | 5.08% | -1.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.66% | 5.02% | -1.36% |
BCFS.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCFS.DE has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than 4UBF.DE's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BCFS.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither BCFS.DE nor 4UBF.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BCFS.DE and 4UBF.DE have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 4UBF.DE is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
4UBF.DE is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for BCFS.DE.
BCFS.DE is categorized as Options Trading, while 4UBF.DE is European Corporate Bonds. BCFS.DE tracks US Equity Defensive Put Write (EUR Hedged) Index, while 4UBF.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for BCFS.DE and 0.13% for 4UBF.DE.
Find the right allocation for BCFS.DE and 4UBF.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer