PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMR vs. UUUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SMR vs. UUUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) and Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMR achieves a -30.20% return, which is significantly lower than UUUU's 3.44% return.


SMR

1D
3.34%
1M
-17.31%
YTD
-30.20%
6M
-46.07%
1Y
-75.51%
3Y*
5.43%
5Y*
-0.32%
10Y*

UUUU

1D
-0.27%
1M
-25.47%
YTD
3.44%
6M
3.23%
1Y
180.07%
3Y*
32.20%
5Y*
16.43%
10Y*
20.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMR vs. UUUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SMR
NuScale Power Corporation
-30.20%-20.97%444.98%-67.93%2.29%-0.89%1.20%
UUUU
Energy Fuels Inc.
3.44%183.43%-28.65%15.78%-18.61%79.11%48.95%

Correlation

The correlation between SMR and UUUU is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2020

0.33

Over the past year, SMR and UUUU have become more correlated (0.54) than their long-term average of 0.33, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

EPS

SMR:

-$2.02

UUUU:

-$0.41

PS Ratio

SMR:

104.42

UUUU:

30.36

Total Revenue (TTM)

SMR:

$18.10M

UUUU:

$84.86M

Gross Profit (TTM)

SMR:

$4.45M

UUUU:

$31.69M

EBITDA (TTM)

SMR:

-$696.20M

UUUU:

-$78.89M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMR vs. UUUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMR
SMR Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
SMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMR Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
SMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMR Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

UUUU
UUUU Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
UUUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UUUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
UUUU Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
UUUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
UUUU Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMR vs. UUUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) and Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMRUUUUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.29

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.91

3.53

-4.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.32

6.84

-8.16

SMR vs. UUUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMR Sharpe Ratio is -0.74, which is lower than the UUUU Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMR and UUUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMR vs. UUUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMR drawdown since its inception was -87.47%, smaller than the maximum UUUU drawdown of -99.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMR and UUUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMRUUUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.47%

-99.64%

+12.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-82.86%

-51.28%

-31.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-82.86%

-61.52%

-21.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-87.47%

-68.70%

-18.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-81.49%

-93.60%

+12.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.08%

-92.63%

+57.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

57.39%

26.43%

+30.96%

Volatility

SMR vs. UUUU - Volatility Comparison

NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) has a higher volatility of 28.93% compared to Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU) at 27.22%. This indicates that SMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UUUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMRUUUUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.93%

27.22%

+1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

69.57%

67.09%

+2.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

102.59%

95.70%

+6.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

93.50%

73.40%

+20.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

89.31%

72.59%

+16.72%

Dividends

SMR vs. UUUU - Dividend Comparison

Neither SMR nor UUUU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

SMR vs. UUUU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NuScale Power Corporation and Energy Fuels Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00M20.00M30.00M40.00M202220232024202520260
35.84M
(SMR) Total Revenue
(UUUU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


SMR and UUUU have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMR has higher volatility (28.93%) compared to UUUU (27.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMR dropped -87.47% vs UUUU's -99.64%.

UUUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMR and UUUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer