SMR vs. LTBR
SMR (NuScale Power Corporation) and LTBR (Lightbridge Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — SMR in Specialty Industrial Machinery, LTBR in Electrical Equipment & Parts. Over the past 5 years, SMR returned -3.46%/yr vs 6.16%/yr for LTBR. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
SMR vs. LTBR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMR achieves a -40.58% return, which is significantly lower than LTBR's -34.81% return.
SMR
- 1D
- -2.09%
- 1M
- -13.73%
- 6M
- -51.83%
- YTD
- -40.58%
- 1Y
- -81.05%
- 3Y*
- 3.93%
- 5Y*
- -3.46%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -3.00%
LTBR
- 1D
- -2.37%
- 1M
- -4.63%
- 6M
- -46.44%
- YTD
- -34.81%
- 1Y
- -37.00%
- 3Y*
- 8.17%
- 5Y*
- 6.16%
- 10Y*
- -14.40%
- ALL TIME*
- -19.60%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $9.78M | $7.67M | $9.61M | |
| $284.93M | $251.84M | $349.52M |
SMR vs. LTBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMR NuScale Power Corporation | -40.58% | -20.97% | 444.98% | -67.93% | 2.29% | -0.89% | 1.20% |
LTBR Lightbridge Corporation | -34.81% | 167.23% | 47.35% | -17.48% | -41.28% | 56.62% | 23.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMR and LTBR is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2020 | 0.43 |
Over the past year, SMR and LTBR have become more correlated (0.74) than their long-term average of 0.43, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
SMR:
$2.51B
LTBR:
$289.61M
SMR:
-$1.83
LTBR:
-$0.80
SMR:
2.31
LTBR:
1.21
SMR:
$18.10M
LTBR:
$0.00
SMR:
$4.45M
LTBR:
$0.00
SMR:
-$696.20M
LTBR:
-$11.77M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMR vs. LTBR — Risk / Return Rank
SMR
LTBR
SMR vs. LTBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) and Lightbridge Corporation (LTBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMR | LTBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.00 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.97 | -0.53 | -0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.30 | -0.82 | -0.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMR vs. LTBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMR drawdown since its inception was -87.47%, smaller than the maximum LTBR drawdown of -99.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMR and LTBR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMR | LTBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.47% | -99.96% | +12.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -85.79% | -74.03% | -11.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -85.79% | -74.03% | -11.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.47% | -83.72% | -3.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -95.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -84.24% | -99.80% | +15.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.19% | -95.04% | +58.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 64.46% | 47.40% | +17.06% |
Volatility
SMR vs. LTBR - Volatility Comparison
NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) has a higher volatility of 26.32% compared to Lightbridge Corporation (LTBR) at 23.67%. This indicates that SMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LTBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMR | LTBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.32% | 23.67% | +2.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 68.24% | 58.85% | +9.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 101.34% | 96.89% | +4.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.68% | 109.07% | -14.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 89.34% | 104.87% | -15.53% |
Dividends
SMR vs. LTBR - Dividend Comparison
Neither SMR nor LTBR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
SMR vs. LTBR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NuScale Power Corporation and Lightbridge Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
SMR and LTBR have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMR has higher volatility (26.32%) compared to LTBR (23.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMR dropped -87.47% vs LTBR's -99.96%.
LTBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.40 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMR and LTBR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer