LTBR vs. LEU

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Lightbridge Corporation (LTBR) and Centrus Energy Corp. (LEU).

Performance

LTBR vs. LEU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lightbridge Corporation (LTBR) and Centrus Energy Corp. (LEU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LTBR vs. LEU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LTBR Lightbridge Corporation	-15.66%	167.23%	47.35%	-17.48%	-41.28%	56.62%	-6.00%	-31.19%	-55.33%	7.02%
LEU Centrus Energy Corp.	-28.49%	264.45%	22.42%	67.52%	-34.92%	115.78%	236.19%	307.10%	-57.86%	-37.15%

Fundamentals

EPS LTBR : -$0.73 LEU : $3.92
Total Revenue (TTM) LTBR : $0.00 LEU : $448.70M
Gross Profit (TTM) LTBR : $0.00 LEU : $117.50M
EBITDA (TTM) LTBR : -$12.38M LEU : $94.20M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTBR achieves a -15.66% return, which is significantly higher than LEU's -28.49% return. Over the past 10 years, LTBR has underperformed LEU with an annualized return of -10.91%, while LEU has yielded a comparatively higher 44.32% annualized return.

LTBR

• 1D: 8.22%
• 1M: -17.56%
• YTD: -15.66%
• 6M: -49.74%
• 1Y: 42.90%
• 3Y*: 37.51%
• 5Y*: 10.78%
• 10Y*: -10.91%

LEU

• 1D: 3.01%
• 1M: -14.31%
• YTD: -28.49%
• 6M: -44.02%
• 1Y: 179.04%
• 3Y*: 75.34%
• 5Y*: 48.51%
• 10Y*: 44.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

LTBR vs. LEU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTBR

LTBR Risk / Return Rank: 61
LTBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
LTBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
LTBR Omega Ratio Rank: 62
LTBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
LTBR Martin Ratio Rank: 57

LEU

LEU Risk / Return Rank: 85
LEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
LEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
LEU Omega Ratio Rank: 83
LEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
LEU Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTBR vs. LEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lightbridge Corporation (LTBR) and Centrus Energy Corp. (LEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LTBR	LEU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.40	1.92	-1.52
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.42	2.46	-1.04
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.30	-0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.75	2.64	-1.89
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.52	5.57	-4.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LTBR vs. LEU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTBR Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the LEU Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTBR and LEU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LTBR	LEU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40	1.92	-1.52
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10	0.57	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.10	0.54	-0.64
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.13	-0.10	-0.03

Correlation

The correlation between LTBR and LEU is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

LTBR vs. LEU - Dividend Comparison

Neither LTBR nor LEU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

LTBR vs. LEU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTBR drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, roughly equal to the maximum LEU drawdown of -99.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTBR and LEU.

Drawdown Indicators

	LTBR	LEU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.96%	-99.98%	+0.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-64.47%	-61.35%	-3.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-83.72%	-78.23%	-5.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-95.69%	-83.84%	-11.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.74%	-97.44%	-2.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-94.99%	-73.82%	-21.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	31.73%	29.08%	+2.65%

Volatility

LTBR vs. LEU - Volatility Comparison

Lightbridge Corporation (LTBR) and Centrus Energy Corp. (LEU) have volatilities of 18.40% and 18.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LTBR	LEU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.40%	18.99%	-0.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	71.36%	67.98%	+3.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	107.99%	93.93%	+14.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	109.09%	85.22%	+23.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	105.88%	82.31%	+23.57%

Financials