LTBR vs. CCJ
Compare and contrast key facts about Lightbridge Corporation (LTBR) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ).
Performance
LTBR vs. CCJ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LTBR vs. CCJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTBR Lightbridge Corporation | -15.66% | 167.23% | 47.35% | -17.48% | -41.28% | 56.62% | -6.00% | -31.19% | -55.33% | 7.02% |
CCJ Cameco Corporation | 18.71% | 78.38% | 19.47% | 90.49% | 4.35% | 63.19% | 51.47% | -21.08% | 23.58% | -8.20% |
Fundamentals
LTBR:
-$0.73
CCJ:
$1.35
LTBR:
$0.00
CCJ:
$3.48B
LTBR:
$0.00
CCJ:
$1.02B
LTBR:
-$12.38M
CCJ:
$1.05B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LTBR achieves a -15.66% return, which is significantly lower than CCJ's 18.71% return. Over the past 10 years, LTBR has underperformed CCJ with an annualized return of -10.91%, while CCJ has yielded a comparatively higher 25.21% annualized return.
LTBR
- 1D
- 8.22%
- 1M
- -17.56%
- YTD
- -15.66%
- 6M
- -49.74%
- 1Y
- 42.90%
- 3Y*
- 37.51%
- 5Y*
- 10.78%
- 10Y*
- -10.91%
CCJ
- 1D
- 5.61%
- 1M
- -8.27%
- YTD
- 18.71%
- 6M
- 29.77%
- 1Y
- 164.39%
- 3Y*
- 61.02%
- 5Y*
- 44.84%
- 10Y*
- 25.21%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LTBR vs. CCJ — Risk / Return Rank
LTBR
CCJ
LTBR vs. CCJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lightbridge Corporation (LTBR) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LTBR | CCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.40 | 3.03 | -2.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.42 | 3.56 | -2.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.44 | -0.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | 6.23 | -5.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.52 | 16.57 | -15.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LTBR | CCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 | 3.03 | -2.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.91 | -0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.10 | 0.55 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.13 | 0.24 | -0.36 |
Correlation
The correlation between LTBR and CCJ is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
LTBR vs. CCJ - Dividend Comparison
LTBR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTBR Lightbridge Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CCJ Cameco Corporation | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.22% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.29% | 0.46% | 0.67% | 0.53% | 4.33% | 3.82% | 3.24% |
Drawdowns
LTBR vs. CCJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LTBR drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than CCJ's maximum drawdown of -87.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTBR and CCJ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LTBR | CCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.96% | -87.53% | -12.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -64.47% | -25.69% | -38.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.72% | -40.01% | -43.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.69% | -57.22% | -38.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.74% | -19.00% | -80.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -94.99% | -46.29% | -48.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.73% | 9.67% | +22.06% |
Volatility
LTBR vs. CCJ - Volatility Comparison
Lightbridge Corporation (LTBR) has a higher volatility of 18.40% compared to Cameco Corporation (CCJ) at 17.51%. This indicates that LTBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LTBR | CCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.40% | 17.51% | +0.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 71.36% | 41.70% | +29.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 107.99% | 54.64% | +53.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 109.09% | 49.71% | +59.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 105.88% | 46.28% | +59.60% |
Financials
LTBR vs. CCJ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lightbridge Corporation and Cameco Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities