LTBR vs. CCJ

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

LTBR (Lightbridge Corporation) and CCJ (Cameco Corporation) are both stocks. LTBR operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials), while CCJ operates in Uranium (Energy). Over the past 10 years, LTBR returned -7.68%/yr vs 27.54%/yr for CCJ. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LTBR vs. CCJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lightbridge Corporation (LTBR) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTBR achieves a -3.96% return, which is significantly lower than CCJ's 31.72% return. Over the past 10 years, LTBR has underperformed CCJ with an annualized return of -7.68%, while CCJ has yielded a comparatively higher 27.54% annualized return.

LTBR

• 1D: 5.02%
• 1M: -3.42%
• YTD: -3.96%
• 6M: -22.77%
• 1Y: -14.57%
• 3Y*: 38.29%
• 5Y*: 13.31%
• 10Y*: -7.68%

CCJ

• 1D: 7.03%
• 1M: -0.07%
• YTD: 31.72%
• 6M: 36.59%
• 1Y: 107.54%
• 3Y*: 59.13%
• 5Y*: 42.20%
• 10Y*: 27.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTBR vs. CCJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LTBR Lightbridge Corporation	-3.96%	167.23%	47.35%	-17.48%	-41.28%	56.62%	-6.00%	-31.19%	-55.33%	7.02%
CCJ Cameco Corporation	31.72%	78.38%	19.47%	90.49%	4.35%	63.19%	51.47%	-21.08%	23.58%	-8.20%

Correlation

The correlation between LTBR and CCJ is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.46
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2000	0.16

Over the past year, LTBR and CCJ have become more correlated (0.64) than their long-term average of 0.16, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap LTBR : $389.01M CCJ : $52.50B
EPS LTBR : -$0.84 CCJ : $1.49
PB Ratio LTBR : 1.79 CCJ : 7.41
Total Revenue (TTM) LTBR : $0.00 CCJ : $3.54B
Gross Profit (TTM) LTBR : $0.00 CCJ : $1.04B
EBITDA (TTM) LTBR : -$11.77M CCJ : $996.66M

Return for Risk

LTBR vs. CCJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTBR

LTBR Risk / Return Rank: 35
LTBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
LTBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
LTBR Omega Ratio Rank: 40
LTBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
LTBR Martin Ratio Rank: 31

CCJ

CCJ Risk / Return Rank: 85
CCJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
CCJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
CCJ Omega Ratio Rank: 82
CCJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
CCJ Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTBR vs. CCJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lightbridge Corporation (LTBR) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LTBR	CCJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.15	1.98	-2.13
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.50	2.74	-2.24
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.33	-0.27
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.30	4.14	-4.44
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.50	9.41	-9.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LTBR vs. CCJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTBR Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is lower than the CCJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTBR and CCJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LTBR	CCJ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.15	1.98	-2.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12	0.86	-0.73
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.07	0.59	-0.67
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.12	0.24	-0.37

Drawdowns

LTBR vs. CCJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTBR drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than CCJ's maximum drawdown of -87.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTBR and CCJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	LTBR	CCJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.96%	-87.53%	-12.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-64.47%	-25.69%	-38.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-65.21%	-40.01%	-25.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-83.72%	-40.01%	-43.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-95.69%	-57.22%	-38.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.70%	-10.13%	-89.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-95.02%	-46.10%	-48.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	38.94%	11.29%	+27.65%

Volatility

LTBR vs. CCJ - Volatility Comparison

Lightbridge Corporation (LTBR) has a higher volatility of 22.96% compared to Cameco Corporation (CCJ) at 15.15%. This indicates that LTBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LTBR	CCJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.96%	15.15%	+7.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	59.17%	37.70%	+21.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	99.22%	54.69%	+44.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	108.89%	49.64%	+59.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	106.03%	46.58%	+59.45%

Dividends

LTBR vs. CCJ - Dividend Comparison

LTBR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CCJ Cameco Corporation	0.14%	0.19%	0.22%	0.20%	0.39%	0.29%	0.46%	0.67%	0.53%	4.33%	3.82%	3.24%
LTBR Lightbridge Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LTBR and CCJ in my portfolio?

LTBR and CCJ have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LTBR or CCJ?

LTBR has higher volatility (22.96%) compared to CCJ (15.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTBR dropped -99.96% vs CCJ's -87.53%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CCJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.