PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMOT vs. IJH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMOT vs. IJH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF (SMOT) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMOT achieves a 10.51% return, which is significantly lower than IJH's 15.88% return.


SMOT

1D
1.18%
1M
1.25%
6M
8.25%
YTD
10.51%
1Y
15.93%
3Y*
11.06%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.83%

IJH

1D
1.12%
1M
0.03%
6M
10.44%
YTD
15.88%
1Y
24.18%
3Y*
13.99%
5Y*
8.86%
10Y*
10.97%
ALL TIME*
9.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$455.75M$451.31M$537.83M
$1.13M$990.83K$960.21K

SMOT vs. IJH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SMOT
VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF
10.51%6.46%10.71%17.31%3.85%
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
15.88%7.42%13.92%16.40%4.06%

Correlation

The correlation between SMOT and IJH is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2022

0.92

The correlation between SMOT and IJH shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SMOT vs. IJH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SMOT
IJH

Healthcare

23.6%
8.9%

Industrials

16.3%
25.2%

Consumer Cyclical

13.2%
10.5%

Technology

10.9%
17.5%

Consumer Defensive

10.8%
3.2%

Basic Materials

9.1%
4.8%

Financial Services

8.2%
13.9%

Communication Services

3.2%
1.5%

Real Estate

2.3%
7.2%

Energy

1.8%
4.6%

Utilities

0.7%
2.8%

Healthcare

SMOT
23.6%
IJH
8.9%

Industrials

SMOT
16.3%
IJH
25.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SMOT
13.2%
IJH
10.5%

Technology

SMOT
10.9%
IJH
17.5%

Consumer Defensive

SMOT
10.8%
IJH
3.2%

Basic Materials

SMOT
9.1%
IJH
4.8%

Financial Services

SMOT
8.2%
IJH
13.9%

Communication Services

SMOT
3.2%
IJH
1.5%

Real Estate

SMOT
2.3%
IJH
7.2%

Energy

SMOT
1.8%
IJH
4.6%

Utilities

SMOT
0.7%
IJH
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMOT vs. IJH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SMOT
SMOT Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
SMOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMOT Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
SMOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMOT Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

IJH
IJH Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJH Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
IJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJH Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SMOT vs. IJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF (SMOT) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMOTIJHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.28

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

2.75

-0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.84

10.01

-4.16

SMOT vs. IJH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMOT Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is comparable to the IJH Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMOT and IJH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMOT vs. IJH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMOT drawdown since its inception was -23.36%, smaller than the maximum IJH drawdown of -55.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMOT and IJH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMOTIJHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.36%

-55.07%

+31.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.91%

-8.83%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.36%

-24.10%

+0.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.17%

-1.30%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.67%

-7.53%

+2.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

2.42%

+0.31%

Volatility

SMOT vs. IJH - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF (SMOT) has a higher volatility of 4.10% compared to iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) at 3.63%. This indicates that SMOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMOTIJHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.10%

3.63%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.25%

11.63%

-1.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.24%

15.70%

-1.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.31%

19.68%

-1.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.31%

21.14%

-2.83%

SMOT vs. IJH - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMOT has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IJH's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMOT vs. IJH - Dividend Comparison

SMOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, more than IJH's 1.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
1.17%1.36%1.33%1.46%1.68%1.18%1.28%1.63%1.72%1.19%1.60%1.56%
SMOT
VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF
1.24%1.37%1.18%0.65%0.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMOT and IJH have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMOT has higher volatility (4.10%) compared to IJH (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMOT dropped -23.36% vs IJH's -55.07%.

On 3-year performance, IJH leads with 13.99% vs 11.06% for SMOT. On fees, IJH is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, IJH has been the lower-risk option at 3.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, IJH has performed better with a 13.99% return vs 11.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IJH is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for SMOT.

SMOT has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 1.17% for IJH.

SMOT tracks Morningstar US Small-Mid Cap Moat Focus, while IJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SMOT and 0.05% for IJH.

IJH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMOT and IJH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer