SMOT vs. FNY
SMOT (VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF) and FNY (First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - SMOT is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Small-Mid Cap Moat Focus, while FNY is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Mid Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SMOT returned 12.55%/yr vs 20.44%/yr for FNY. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SMOT charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for FNY.
Performance
SMOT vs. FNY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMOT achieves a 8.04% return, which is significantly lower than FNY's 15.54% return.
SMOT
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 4.43%
- YTD
- 8.04%
- 6M
- 8.53%
- 1Y
- 18.20%
- 3Y*
- 12.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNY
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 2.61%
- YTD
- 15.54%
- 6M
- 13.60%
- 1Y
- 31.55%
- 3Y*
- 20.44%
- 5Y*
- 8.54%
- 10Y*
- 13.71%
SMOT vs. FNY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMOT VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF | 8.04% | 6.46% | 10.71% | 17.31% | 5.41% |
FNY First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund | 15.54% | 14.03% | 18.09% | 21.13% | -0.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMOT and FNY is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2022 | 0.87 |
The correlation between SMOT and FNY shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SMOT vs. FNY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMOT
FNY
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Communication Services
Technology
SMOT
FNY
Healthcare
SMOT
FNY
Consumer Cyclical
SMOT
FNY
Industrials
SMOT
FNY
Basic Materials
SMOT
FNY
Consumer Defensive
SMOT
FNY
Financial Services
SMOT
FNY
Energy
SMOT
FNY
Utilities
SMOT
FNY
Real Estate
SMOT
FNY
Communication Services
SMOT
FNY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMOT vs. FNY — Risk / Return Rank
SMOT
FNY
SMOT vs. FNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF (SMOT) and First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMOT | FNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.27 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | 2.64 | -0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.57 | 9.57 | -3.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMOT | FNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29 | 1.59 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.56 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
SMOT vs. FNY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMOT drawdown since its inception was -23.36%, smaller than the maximum FNY drawdown of -38.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMOT and FNY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMOT | FNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.36% | -38.91% | +15.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.91% | -12.01% | +3.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.36% | -24.97% | +1.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.46% | +0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.81% | -7.60% | +2.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.78% | 3.30% | -0.52% |
Volatility
SMOT vs. FNY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF (SMOT) is 3.03%, while First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FNY) has a volatility of 6.18%. This indicates that SMOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMOT | FNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.03% | 6.18% | -3.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.50% | 15.04% | -5.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.12% | 19.90% | -5.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.42% | 22.30% | -3.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.42% | 22.34% | -3.92% |
SMOT vs. FNY - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMOT has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than FNY's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMOT vs. FNY - Dividend Comparison
SMOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, more than FNY's 0.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNY First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.56% | 0.24% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.25% | 0.28% | 0.06% | 0.21% | 0.60% | 0.46% |
SMOT VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF | 1.27% | 1.37% | 1.18% | 0.65% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMOT and FNY have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FNY has higher volatility (6.18%) compared to SMOT (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMOT dropped -23.36% vs FNY's -38.91%.
On 3-year performance, FNY leads with 20.44% vs 12.55% for SMOT. On fees, SMOT is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, SMOT has been the lower-risk option at 3.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FNY has performed better with a 20.44% return vs 12.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMOT is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FNY.
SMOT has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.03% for FNY.
SMOT is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while FNY is Mid Cap Growth Equities. SMOT tracks Morningstar US Small-Mid Cap Moat Focus, while FNY tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Mid Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SMOT and 0.70% for FNY.
FNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMOT and FNY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer