SMOT vs. VOO
SMOT (VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMOT is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Small-Mid Cap Moat Focus, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SMOT returned 12.06%/yr vs 22.73%/yr for VOO. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMOT charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
SMOT vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMOT achieves a 7.27% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 11.69% return.
SMOT
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- 4.07%
- YTD
- 7.27%
- 6M
- 8.91%
- 1Y
- 18.52%
- 3Y*
- 12.06%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VOO
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 5.39%
- YTD
- 11.69%
- 6M
- 12.11%
- 1Y
- 29.68%
- 3Y*
- 22.73%
- 5Y*
- 14.26%
- 10Y*
- 15.65%
SMOT vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMOT VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF | 7.27% | 6.46% | 10.71% | 17.31% | 5.41% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 11.69% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | 2.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMOT and VOO is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2022 | 0.80 |
The correlation between SMOT and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SMOT vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMOT
VOO
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Communication Services
Technology
SMOT
VOO
Healthcare
SMOT
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
SMOT
VOO
Industrials
SMOT
VOO
Basic Materials
SMOT
VOO
Consumer Defensive
SMOT
VOO
Financial Services
SMOT
VOO
Energy
SMOT
VOO
Utilities
SMOT
VOO
Real Estate
SMOT
VOO
Communication Services
SMOT
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMOT vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
SMOT
VOO
SMOT vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF (SMOT) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMOT | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.32 | 2.53 | -1.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.01 | 3.43 | -1.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.46 | -0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | 3.42 | -1.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.43 | 15.95 | -9.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMOT | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 2.53 | -1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.89 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
SMOT vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMOT drawdown since its inception was -23.36%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMOT and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMOT | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.36% | -33.99% | +10.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.91% | -8.90% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.36% | -18.69% | -4.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.82% | -3.69% | -1.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.78% | 1.91% | +0.87% |
Volatility
SMOT vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF (SMOT) has a higher volatility of 3.09% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.74%. This indicates that SMOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMOT | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.09% | 2.74% | +0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.47% | 8.88% | +0.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.15% | 11.78% | +2.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.43% | 16.81% | +1.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.43% | 18.01% | +0.42% |
SMOT vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMOT has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMOT vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
SMOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, more than VOO's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMOT VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF | 1.28% | 1.37% | 1.18% | 0.65% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.02% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMOT and VOO have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMOT has higher volatility (3.09%) compared to VOO (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMOT dropped -23.36% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 3-year performance, VOO leads with 22.73% vs 12.06% for SMOT. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VOO has performed better with a 22.73% return vs 12.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for SMOT.
SMOT has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 1.02% for VOO.
SMOT is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. SMOT tracks Morningstar US Small-Mid Cap Moat Focus, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SMOT and 0.03% for VOO.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMOT and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer