SMOM vs. XSVM
SMOM (Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF) and XSVM (Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMOM is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Symmetry Partners, while XSVM is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 High Momentum Value Index. SMOM is actively managed, while XSVM is passively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMOM charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.37%/yr for XSVM.
Performance
SMOM vs. XSVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMOM achieves a 9.82% return, which is significantly lower than XSVM's 16.87% return.
SMOM
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 5.93%
- YTD
- 9.82%
- 6M
- 10.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XSVM
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- 1.71%
- YTD
- 16.87%
- 6M
- 16.68%
- 1Y
- 34.73%
- 3Y*
- 15.99%
- 5Y*
- 6.37%
- 10Y*
- 12.72%
SMOM vs. XSVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 9.82% | 2.81% |
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF | 16.87% | 1.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMOM and XSVM is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2025 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMOM vs. XSVM — Risk / Return Rank
SMOM
XSVM
SMOM vs. XSVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF (SMOM) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMOM | XSVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.45 | 0.36 | +1.08 |
Drawdowns
SMOM vs. XSVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMOM drawdown since its inception was -7.45%, smaller than the maximum XSVM drawdown of -62.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMOM and XSVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMOM | XSVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.45% | -62.57% | +55.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.47% | +1.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.48% | -11.57% | +10.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.27% | — |
Volatility
SMOM vs. XSVM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMOM | XSVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.24% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.05% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.62% | 18.59% | -5.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.62% | 22.71% | -10.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.62% | 25.09% | -12.47% |
SMOM vs. XSVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMOM has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than XSVM's 0.37% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMOM vs. XSVM - Dividend Comparison
SMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than XSVM's 1.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 0.15% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF | 1.81% | 2.29% | 1.69% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.23% | 1.21% | 1.22% | 2.54% | 1.90% | 2.29% | 2.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMOM and XSVM have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XSVM is cheaper at 0.37% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XSVM is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for SMOM.
XSVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 0.15% for SMOM.
SMOM is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while XSVM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Symmetry Partners and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for SMOM and 0.37% for XSVM.
Find the right allocation for SMOM and XSVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer