SMOM vs. PTH
SMOM (Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF) and PTH (Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMOM is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Symmetry Partners, while PTH is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Healthcare Technical Leaders Index. SMOM is actively managed, while PTH is passively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMOM charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PTH.
Performance
SMOM vs. PTH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMOM achieves a 7.03% return, which is significantly lower than PTH's 10.66% return.
SMOM
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- -0.47%
- YTD
- 7.03%
- 6M
- 6.00%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PTH
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 7.38%
- YTD
- 10.66%
- 6M
- 8.96%
- 1Y
- 47.97%
- 3Y*
- 12.29%
- 5Y*
- 0.29%
- 10Y*
- 14.65%
SMOM vs. PTH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 7.03% | 2.78% |
PTH Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF | 10.66% | 25.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMOM and PTH is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMOM vs. PTH — Risk / Return Rank
SMOM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PTH
SMOM vs. PTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF (SMOM) and Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMOM | PTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.33 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.02 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.05 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMOM vs. PTH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMOM drawdown since its inception was -7.45%, smaller than the maximum PTH drawdown of -53.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMOM and PTH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMOM | PTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.45% | -53.52% | +46.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -50.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -53.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.54% | -9.70% | +7.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.49% | -16.99% | +15.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.79% | — |
Volatility
SMOM vs. PTH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMOM | PTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.29% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.85% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.80% | 24.06% | -11.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.80% | 25.57% | -12.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.80% | 27.30% | -14.50% |
SMOM vs. PTH - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMOM has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than PTH's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMOM vs. PTH - Dividend Comparison
SMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than PTH's 2.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
PTH Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF | 2.78% | 3.07% | 0.06% |
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 0.15% | 0.16% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMOM and PTH have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PTH is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PTH is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for SMOM.
PTH has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 0.15% for SMOM.
SMOM is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while PTH is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Symmetry Partners and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for SMOM and 0.60% for PTH.
Find the right allocation for SMOM and PTH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer