SMOM vs. MTUM
SMOM (Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF) and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMOM is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Symmetry Partners, while MTUM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. SMOM is actively managed, while MTUM is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SMOM charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTUM.
Performance
SMOM vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMOM achieves a 9.82% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 31.75% return.
SMOM
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 5.93%
- YTD
- 9.82%
- 6M
- 10.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MTUM
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- 15.90%
- YTD
- 31.75%
- 6M
- 32.38%
- 1Y
- 41.76%
- 3Y*
- 34.75%
- 5Y*
- 15.21%
- 10Y*
- 17.31%
SMOM vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 9.82% | 2.81% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 31.75% | -1.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMOM and MTUM is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2025 | 0.84 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMOM vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank
SMOM
MTUM
SMOM vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF (SMOM) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMOM | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.45 | 0.85 | +0.60 |
Drawdowns
SMOM vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMOM drawdown since its inception was -7.45%, smaller than the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMOM and MTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMOM | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.45% | -34.08% | +26.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.48% | -6.21% | +4.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.89% | — |
Volatility
SMOM vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMOM | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.68% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.46% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.62% | 19.04% | -6.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.62% | 20.60% | -7.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.62% | 21.03% | -8.41% |
SMOM vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMOM has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMOM vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison
SMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than MTUM's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 0.60% | 0.91% | 0.75% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.12% |
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 0.15% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMOM and MTUM have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for SMOM.
MTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.15% for SMOM.
SMOM is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Symmetry Partners and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for SMOM and 0.15% for MTUM.
Find the right allocation for SMOM and MTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer