SMOM vs. GMOM
SMOM (Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF) and GMOM (Cambria Global Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMOM is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Symmetry Partners, while GMOM is a Momentum fund actively managed by Cambria. Both are actively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMOM charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for GMOM.
Performance
SMOM vs. GMOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMOM achieves a 9.53% return, which is significantly lower than GMOM's 11.82% return.
SMOM
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 4.63%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 10.08%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GMOM
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 11.82%
- 6M
- 13.95%
- 1Y
- 29.52%
- 3Y*
- 13.91%
- 5Y*
- 7.06%
- 10Y*
- 7.62%
SMOM vs. GMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 9.53% | 2.81% |
GMOM Cambria Global Momentum ETF | 11.82% | 7.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMOM and GMOM is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2025 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMOM vs. GMOM — Risk / Return Rank
SMOM
GMOM
SMOM vs. GMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF (SMOM) and Cambria Global Momentum ETF (GMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMOM | GMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.41 | 0.49 | +0.91 |
Drawdowns
SMOM vs. GMOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMOM drawdown since its inception was -7.45%, smaller than the maximum GMOM drawdown of -25.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMOM and GMOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMOM | GMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.45% | -25.03% | +17.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.16% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.27% | -1.85% | +1.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.47% | -7.81% | +6.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.44% | — |
Volatility
SMOM vs. GMOM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMOM | GMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.23% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.18% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.59% | 13.61% | -1.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.59% | 14.41% | -1.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.59% | 12.82% | -0.23% |
SMOM vs. GMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMOM has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than GMOM's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMOM vs. GMOM - Dividend Comparison
SMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than GMOM's 1.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMOM Cambria Global Momentum ETF | 1.58% | 3.01% | 2.16% | 3.63% | 2.52% | 3.42% | 1.24% | 2.60% | 1.90% | 2.05% | 1.77% | 1.88% |
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 0.15% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMOM and GMOM have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SMOM is cheaper at 0.63% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMOM is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for GMOM.
GMOM has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.15% for SMOM.
SMOM is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while GMOM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Symmetry Partners and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for SMOM and 0.96% for GMOM.
Find the right allocation for SMOM and GMOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer