SMOM vs. CNAV

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

SMOM (Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF) and CNAV (Mohr Company Nav ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMOM charges 0.63%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for CNAV.

Performance

SMOM vs. CNAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF (SMOM) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMOM achieves a 8.42% return, which is significantly lower than CNAV's 41.21% return.

SMOM

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: 0.68%
• 6M: 6.76%
• YTD: 8.42%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CNAV

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: -0.30%
• 6M: 36.40%
• YTD: 41.21%
• 1Y: 62.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMOM vs. CNAV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF	8.42%	2.78%
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF	41.21%	5.22%

Correlation

The correlation between SMOM and CNAV is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025	0.74

Return for Risk

SMOM vs. CNAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMOM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CNAV

CNAV Risk / Return Rank: 79
CNAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
CNAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
CNAV Omega Ratio Rank: 72
CNAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
CNAV Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMOM vs. CNAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF (SMOM) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SMOM	CNAV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.93	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.42	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.34	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.61	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	16.24	—

Drawdowns

SMOM vs. CNAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMOM drawdown since its inception was -7.45%, smaller than the maximum CNAV drawdown of -30.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMOM and CNAV.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMOM	CNAV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.45%	-30.06%	+22.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-13.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.27%	-9.45%	+8.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.52%	-5.44%	+3.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.75%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SMOM	CNAV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	18.40%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	28.75%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.58%	31.66%	-19.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.58%	30.32%	-17.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.58%	30.32%	-17.74%

SMOM vs. CNAV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMOM has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than CNAV's 1.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMOM vs. CNAV - Dividend Comparison

SMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, while CNAV has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF	0.00%	0.00%
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF	0.15%	0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMOM and CNAV in my portfolio?

SMOM and CNAV have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SMOM or CNAV?

On fees, SMOM is cheaper at 0.63% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMOM or CNAV?

SMOM is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for CNAV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMOM or CNAV?

SMOM has the higher dividend yield at 0.15%, compared with 0.00% for CNAV.

What is the main difference between SMOM and CNAV?

They also come from different issuers: Symmetry Partners and Mohr. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for SMOM and 1.31% for CNAV.