SMN vs. QTAP
SMN (ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials) and QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SMN is passively managed, while QTAP is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SMN returned -16.15%/yr vs 12.39%/yr for QTAP. At a correlation of -0.52, they often move in opposite directions. SMN charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTAP.
Performance
SMN vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMN achieves a -19.90% return, which is significantly lower than QTAP's 14.04% return.
SMN
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 6.34%
- 6M
- -9.45%
- YTD
- -19.90%
- 1Y
- -20.05%
- 3Y*
- -12.05%
- 5Y*
- -16.15%
- 10Y*
- -24.12%
- ALL TIME*
- -27.55%
QTAP
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- 6M
- 13.83%
- YTD
- 14.04%
- 1Y
- 20.15%
- 3Y*
- 19.24%
- 5Y*
- 12.39%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.61%
SMN vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMN ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials | -19.90% | -17.96% | 7.37% | -20.23% | -3.03% | -29.96% |
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 14.04% | 19.36% | 17.34% | 43.32% | -25.87% | 15.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMN and QTAP is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2021 | -0.52 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between SMN and QTAP has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.52 to -0.31, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMN vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank
SMN
QTAP
SMN vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials (SMN) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMN | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.77 | -0.84 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | 8.13 | -8.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.84 | 40.20 | -41.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMN vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMN drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMN and QTAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMN | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.92% | -29.44% | -70.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.52% | -2.49% | -36.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.71% | -13.03% | -40.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.05% | -29.44% | -36.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.91% | -0.64% | -99.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -90.59% | -4.93% | -85.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.05% | 0.50% | +23.55% |
Volatility
SMN vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials (SMN) has a higher volatility of 9.80% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) at 2.42%. This indicates that SMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMN | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.80% | 2.42% | +7.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.13% | 5.32% | +22.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.26% | 6.29% | +28.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.60% | 18.91% | +20.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.84% | 18.60% | +24.24% |
SMN vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMN has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMN vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison
SMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, while QTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMN ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials | 3.49% | 4.08% | 5.02% | 4.54% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.72% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMN and QTAP have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMN has higher volatility (9.80%) compared to QTAP (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMN dropped -99.92% vs QTAP's -29.44%.
On 5-year performance, QTAP leads with 12.39% vs -16.15% for SMN. On fees, QTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTAP has been the lower-risk option at 2.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QTAP has performed better with a 12.39% return vs -16.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SMN.
SMN has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 0.00% for QTAP.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SMN and 0.79% for QTAP.
QTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.22 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMN and QTAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer