SMN vs. IFED
SMN (ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials) and IFED (ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds - SMN tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index (-200%) while IFED tracks the IFED Large-Cap US Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SMN returned -15.70%/yr vs 16.54%/yr for IFED. At a correlation of -0.66, they often move in opposite directions. SMN charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for IFED.
Performance
SMN vs. IFED - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMN achieves a -22.50% return, which is significantly lower than IFED's -3.07% return.
SMN
- 1D
- 2.68%
- 1M
- -3.51%
- YTD
- -22.50%
- 6M
- -21.16%
- 1Y
- -28.70%
- 3Y*
- -15.70%
- 5Y*
- -16.33%
- 10Y*
- -25.35%
IFED
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 2.47%
- YTD
- -3.07%
- 6M
- -3.90%
- 1Y
- 2.52%
- 3Y*
- 16.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMN vs. IFED - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMN ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials | -22.50% | -17.96% | 7.37% | -20.23% | -3.03% | -21.67% |
IFED ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN | -3.07% | 15.02% | 23.04% | 20.78% | -1.46% | 8.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMN and IFED is -0.39, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2021 | -0.66 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between SMN and IFED has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.66 to -0.39, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMN vs. IFED — Risk / Return Rank
SMN
IFED
SMN vs. IFED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials (SMN) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMN | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.04 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.75 | 0.17 | -0.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.28 | 0.43 | -1.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMN vs. IFED - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMN drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, which is greater than IFED's maximum drawdown of -22.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMN and IFED.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMN | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.92% | -22.36% | -77.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.52% | -14.65% | -23.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.71% | -22.36% | -31.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.91% | -5.05% | -94.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -90.55% | -5.83% | -84.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.40% | 5.88% | +16.52% |
Volatility
SMN vs. IFED - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials (SMN) has a higher volatility of 11.78% compared to ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) at 6.74%. This indicates that SMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMN | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.78% | 6.74% | +5.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.91% | 13.81% | +14.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.15% | 16.84% | +18.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.65% | 19.92% | +19.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.91% | 19.92% | +22.99% |
SMN vs. IFED - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMN has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IFED's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMN vs. IFED - Dividend Comparison
SMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, while IFED has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFED ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMN ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials | 4.54% | 4.08% | 5.02% | 4.54% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.72% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMN and IFED have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMN has higher volatility (11.78%) compared to IFED (6.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMN dropped -99.92% vs IFED's -22.36%.
On 3-year performance, IFED leads with 16.54% vs -15.70% for SMN. On fees, IFED is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, IFED has been the lower-risk option at 6.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IFED has performed better with a 16.54% return vs -15.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IFED is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SMN.
SMN has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 0.00% for IFED.
SMN tracks Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index (-200%), while IFED tracks IFED Large-Cap US Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SMN and 0.45% for IFED.
IFED currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.15 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMN and IFED
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer