SMN vs. IFED
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials (SMN) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED).
SMN and IFED are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SMN is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index (-200%). It was launched on Jan 30, 2007. IFED is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the IFED Large-Cap US Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Sep 14, 2021. Both SMN and IFED are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SMN vs. IFED - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SMN vs. IFED - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMN ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials | -18.15% | -17.96% | 7.37% | -20.23% | -3.03% | -19.23% |
IFED ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN | -10.70% | 15.02% | 23.04% | 20.78% | -1.46% | 8.46% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMN achieves a -18.15% return, which is significantly lower than IFED's -10.70% return.
SMN
- 1D
- -2.72%
- 1M
- 13.58%
- YTD
- -18.15%
- 6M
- -20.28%
- 1Y
- -29.84%
- 3Y*
- -13.54%
- 5Y*
- -16.86%
- 10Y*
- -25.54%
IFED
- 1D
- 2.06%
- 1M
- -5.98%
- YTD
- -10.70%
- 6M
- -11.02%
- 1Y
- 5.41%
- 3Y*
- 14.83%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SMN vs. IFED - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMN has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IFED's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SMN vs. IFED — Risk / Return Rank
SMN
IFED
SMN vs. IFED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials (SMN) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMN | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | 0.29 | -0.99 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.83 | 0.52 | -1.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.07 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 0.39 | -0.97 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.88 | 1.24 | -2.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMN | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.70 | 0.29 | -0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.54 | 0.58 | -1.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between SMN and IFED is -0.69. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
SMN vs. IFED - Dividend Comparison
SMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, while IFED has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMN ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials | 4.30% | 4.08% | 5.02% | 4.54% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.72% | 0.06% |
IFED ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SMN vs. IFED - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMN drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, which is greater than IFED's maximum drawdown of -22.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMN and IFED.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMN | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.92% | -22.36% | -77.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.71% | -14.65% | -39.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.90% | -12.52% | -87.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -90.46% | -5.70% | -84.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.23% | 4.64% | +30.59% |
Volatility
SMN vs. IFED - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials (SMN) has a higher volatility of 12.67% compared to ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) at 4.91%. This indicates that SMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SMN | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.67% | 4.91% | +7.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.22% | 10.83% | +14.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.54% | 18.80% | +23.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.57% | 19.72% | +19.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.87% | 19.72% | +23.15% |