PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMMV vs. IVOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMMV vs. IVOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMMV achieves a 2.54% return, which is significantly lower than IVOO's 14.55% return.


SMMV

1D
0.49%
1M
-1.40%
YTD
2.54%
6M
3.30%
1Y
7.22%
3Y*
11.50%
5Y*
4.97%
10Y*

IVOO

1D
0.36%
1M
2.93%
YTD
14.55%
6M
14.27%
1Y
26.17%
3Y*
16.66%
5Y*
8.23%
10Y*
11.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMMV vs. IVOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMMV
iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF
2.54%6.42%18.29%5.63%-10.00%16.64%-2.88%24.21%1.15%14.31%
IVOO
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF
14.55%7.47%13.77%16.45%-13.17%24.61%13.61%26.18%-11.33%16.38%

Correlation

The correlation between SMMV and IVOO is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2016

0.86

The correlation between SMMV and IVOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SMMV vs. IVOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SMMV
IVOO

Healthcare

17.1%
8.6%

Industrials

13.8%
25.1%

Real Estate

13.4%
7.5%

Technology

10.9%
15.7%

Financial Services

10.9%
14.4%

Consumer Defensive

8.1%
3.8%

Utilities

7.7%
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

5.6%
10.7%

Communication Services

5.4%
1.0%

Energy

4.5%
5.5%

Basic Materials

2.0%
4.8%

Healthcare

SMMV
17.1%
IVOO
8.6%

Industrials

SMMV
13.8%
IVOO
25.1%

Real Estate

SMMV
13.4%
IVOO
7.5%

Technology

SMMV
10.9%
IVOO
15.7%

Financial Services

SMMV
10.9%
IVOO
14.4%

Consumer Defensive

SMMV
8.1%
IVOO
3.8%

Utilities

SMMV
7.7%
IVOO
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SMMV
5.6%
IVOO
10.7%

Communication Services

SMMV
5.4%
IVOO
1.0%

Energy

SMMV
4.5%
IVOO
5.5%

Basic Materials

SMMV
2.0%
IVOO
4.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMMV vs. IVOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMMV
SMMV Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
SMMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMMV Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
SMMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMMV Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

IVOO
IVOO Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
IVOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVOO Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
IVOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVOO Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMMV vs. IVOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMMVIVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.30

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

2.98

-1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.27

10.90

-7.63

SMMV vs. IVOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMMV Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the IVOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMMV and IVOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMMVIVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

1.69

-0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.42

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.62

-0.10

Drawdowns

SMMV vs. IVOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMMV drawdown since its inception was -38.77%, smaller than the maximum IVOO drawdown of -42.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMMV and IVOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMMVIVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.77%

-42.33%

+3.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.02%

-8.81%

+1.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.68%

-24.22%

+10.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.00%

-24.22%

+6.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.98%

0.00%

-3.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.10%

-5.27%

+0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

2.41%

-0.19%

Volatility

SMMV vs. IVOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV) is 2.29%, while Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) has a volatility of 4.24%. This indicates that SMMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMMVIVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.29%

4.24%

-1.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.30%

11.35%

-5.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.72%

15.52%

-5.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.50%

19.72%

-6.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.69%

21.19%

-5.50%

SMMV vs. IVOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMMV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IVOO's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SMMV vs. IVOO - Dividend Comparison

SMMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, more than IVOO's 1.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVOO
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF
1.19%1.35%1.30%1.25%1.58%1.14%1.23%1.49%1.56%1.22%1.37%1.45%
SMMV
iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF
1.74%1.77%1.76%2.30%1.67%1.08%1.39%1.64%1.72%1.63%0.79%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMMV and IVOO have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVOO has higher volatility (4.24%) compared to SMMV (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMMV dropped -38.77% vs IVOO's -42.33%.

On 5-year performance, IVOO leads with 8.23% vs 4.97% for SMMV. On fees, IVOO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, SMMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IVOO has performed better with a 8.23% return vs 4.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVOO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SMMV.

SMMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 1.19% for IVOO.

SMMV tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Minimum Volatility (USD) Index, while IVOO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SMMV and 0.10% for IVOO.

IVOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMMV and IVOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer