SMLV vs. XJR
SMLV (SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF) and XJR (iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMLV is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index, while XJR is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Sustainability Screened Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SMLV returned 8.02%/yr vs 5.18%/yr for XJR. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.12% expense ratio.
Performance
SMLV vs. XJR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SMLV having a 14.81% return and XJR slightly higher at 15.29%.
SMLV
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 1.40%
- YTD
- 14.81%
- 6M
- 15.50%
- 1Y
- 23.44%
- 3Y*
- 15.62%
- 5Y*
- 8.02%
- 10Y*
- 10.25%
XJR
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 15.29%
- 6M
- 14.96%
- 1Y
- 27.56%
- 3Y*
- 13.70%
- 5Y*
- 5.18%
- 10Y*
- —
SMLV vs. XJR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMLV SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | 14.81% | 5.66% | 16.77% | 7.52% | -7.69% | 27.67% | 31.64% |
XJR iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF | 15.29% | 4.73% | 9.59% | 16.39% | -17.30% | 24.96% | 35.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMLV and XJR is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2020 | 0.93 |
The correlation between SMLV and XJR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
SMLV vs. XJR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMLV
XJR
Financial Services
Industrials
Real Estate
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Energy
Financial Services
SMLV
XJR
Industrials
SMLV
XJR
Real Estate
SMLV
XJR
Technology
SMLV
XJR
Consumer Cyclical
SMLV
XJR
Healthcare
SMLV
XJR
Consumer Defensive
SMLV
XJR
Basic Materials
SMLV
XJR
Utilities
SMLV
XJR
Communication Services
SMLV
XJR
Energy
SMLV
XJR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMLV vs. XJR — Risk / Return Rank
SMLV
XJR
SMLV vs. XJR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) and iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMLV | XJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.27 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.21 | 2.93 | +0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.78 | 9.42 | -0.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMLV | XJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | 1.55 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.24 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.67 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
SMLV vs. XJR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMLV drawdown since its inception was -42.45%, which is greater than XJR's maximum drawdown of -27.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMLV and XJR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMLV | XJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.45% | -27.14% | -15.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.34% | -9.43% | +2.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.40% | -27.14% | +6.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.40% | -27.14% | +6.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.08% | +1.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.45% | -9.46% | +4.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.68% | 2.93% | -0.25% |
Volatility
SMLV vs. XJR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) is 4.09%, while iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) has a volatility of 5.06%. This indicates that SMLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XJR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMLV | XJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.09% | 5.06% | -0.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.92% | 12.41% | -2.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.73% | 17.95% | -2.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.29% | 21.45% | -3.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.96% | 21.73% | -0.77% |
SMLV vs. XJR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SMLV and XJR have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SMLV vs. XJR - Dividend Comparison
SMLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, more than XJR's 0.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMLV SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | 2.31% | 2.74% | 2.68% | 2.68% | 2.40% | 2.12% | 2.47% | 2.62% | 3.15% | 7.92% | 3.04% | 2.63% |
XJR iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF | 0.99% | 1.14% | 1.96% | 0.92% | 1.29% | 2.00% | 0.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, SMLV and XJR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
XJR has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to SMLV (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMLV dropped -42.45% vs XJR's -27.14%.
On 5-year performance, SMLV leads with 8.02% vs 5.18% for XJR. Both ETFs have the same 0.12% expense ratio. On volatility, SMLV has been the lower-risk option at 4.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SMLV has performed better with a 8.02% return vs 5.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMLV and XJR have the same expense ratio: 0.12% per year.
SMLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 0.99% for XJR.
SMLV is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while XJR is Small Cap Blend Equities. SMLV tracks SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index, while XJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Sustainability Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares.
XJR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMLV and XJR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer