PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMLV vs. XJR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMLV vs. XJR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) and iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SMLV having a 14.81% return and XJR slightly higher at 15.29%.


SMLV

1D
0.20%
1M
1.40%
YTD
14.81%
6M
15.50%
1Y
23.44%
3Y*
15.62%
5Y*
8.02%
10Y*
10.25%

XJR

1D
0.74%
1M
0.49%
YTD
15.29%
6M
14.96%
1Y
27.56%
3Y*
13.70%
5Y*
5.18%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMLV vs. XJR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SMLV
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
14.81%5.66%16.77%7.52%-7.69%27.67%31.64%
XJR
iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF
15.29%4.73%9.59%16.39%-17.30%24.96%35.61%

Correlation

The correlation between SMLV and XJR is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2020

0.93

The correlation between SMLV and XJR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

SMLV vs. XJR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SMLV
XJR

Financial Services

30.5%
18.2%

Industrials

14.3%
15.5%

Real Estate

12.2%
7.6%

Technology

11.2%
16.8%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
13.5%

Healthcare

8.7%
10.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
2.7%

Basic Materials

3.2%
4.5%

Utilities

2.9%
2.0%

Communication Services

2.2%
2.5%

Energy

1.8%
4.7%

Financial Services

SMLV
30.5%
XJR
18.2%

Industrials

SMLV
14.3%
XJR
15.5%

Real Estate

SMLV
12.2%
XJR
7.6%

Technology

SMLV
11.2%
XJR
16.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SMLV
8.7%
XJR
13.5%

Healthcare

SMLV
8.7%
XJR
10.7%

Consumer Defensive

SMLV
4.3%
XJR
2.7%

Basic Materials

SMLV
3.2%
XJR
4.5%

Utilities

SMLV
2.9%
XJR
2.0%

Communication Services

SMLV
2.2%
XJR
2.5%

Energy

SMLV
1.8%
XJR
4.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMLV vs. XJR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMLV
SMLV Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SMLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMLV Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SMLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMLV Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

XJR
XJR Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
XJR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XJR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
XJR Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
XJR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
XJR Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMLV vs. XJR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) and iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMLVXJRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.27

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

2.93

+0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.78

9.42

-0.64

SMLV vs. XJR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the XJR Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMLV and XJR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMLVXJRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

1.55

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.24

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.67

-0.12

Drawdowns

SMLV vs. XJR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMLV drawdown since its inception was -42.45%, which is greater than XJR's maximum drawdown of -27.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMLV and XJR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMLVXJRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.45%

-27.14%

-15.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.34%

-9.43%

+2.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.40%

-27.14%

+6.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.40%

-27.14%

+6.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.08%

+1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.45%

-9.46%

+4.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

2.93%

-0.25%

Volatility

SMLV vs. XJR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) is 4.09%, while iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) has a volatility of 5.06%. This indicates that SMLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XJR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMLVXJRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.09%

5.06%

-0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.92%

12.41%

-2.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.73%

17.95%

-2.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.29%

21.45%

-3.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.96%

21.73%

-0.77%

SMLV vs. XJR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SMLV and XJR have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SMLV vs. XJR - Dividend Comparison

SMLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, more than XJR's 0.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMLV
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
2.31%2.74%2.68%2.68%2.40%2.12%2.47%2.62%3.15%7.92%3.04%2.63%
XJR
iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF
0.99%1.14%1.96%0.92%1.29%2.00%0.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, SMLV and XJR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

XJR has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to SMLV (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMLV dropped -42.45% vs XJR's -27.14%.

On 5-year performance, SMLV leads with 8.02% vs 5.18% for XJR. Both ETFs have the same 0.12% expense ratio. On volatility, SMLV has been the lower-risk option at 4.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SMLV has performed better with a 8.02% return vs 5.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMLV and XJR have the same expense ratio: 0.12% per year.

SMLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 0.99% for XJR.

SMLV is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while XJR is Small Cap Blend Equities. SMLV tracks SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index, while XJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Sustainability Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares.

XJR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMLV and XJR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer