SMLV vs. SIXH
SMLV (SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF) and SIXH (6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF) are both Volatility Hedged Equity funds. SMLV is passively managed, while SIXH is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SMLV returned 7.75%/yr vs 8.95%/yr for SIXH. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMLV charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for SIXH.
Performance
SMLV vs. SIXH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMLV achieves a 12.88% return, which is significantly higher than SIXH's 7.20% return.
SMLV
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- 1.39%
- YTD
- 12.88%
- 6M
- 12.84%
- 1Y
- 21.90%
- 3Y*
- 15.66%
- 5Y*
- 7.75%
- 10Y*
- 10.05%
SIXH
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- YTD
- 7.20%
- 6M
- 8.70%
- 1Y
- 10.61%
- 3Y*
- 12.22%
- 5Y*
- 8.95%
- 10Y*
- —
SMLV vs. SIXH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMLV SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | 12.88% | 5.66% | 16.77% | 7.52% | -7.69% | 27.67% | 38.26% |
SIXH 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF | 7.20% | 9.47% | 12.06% | 4.93% | 6.90% | 18.37% | 5.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMLV and SIXH is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2020 | 0.50 |
The correlation between SMLV and SIXH shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SMLV vs. SIXH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMLV
SIXH
Financial Services
Industrials
Real Estate
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Energy
Financial Services
SMLV
SIXH
Industrials
SMLV
SIXH
Real Estate
SMLV
SIXH
Technology
SMLV
SIXH
Consumer Cyclical
SMLV
SIXH
Healthcare
SMLV
SIXH
Consumer Defensive
SMLV
SIXH
Basic Materials
SMLV
SIXH
Utilities
SMLV
SIXH
Communication Services
SMLV
SIXH
Energy
SMLV
SIXH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMLV vs. SIXH — Risk / Return Rank
SMLV
SIXH
SMLV vs. SIXH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) and 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMLV | SIXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.25 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 2.44 | +0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.20 | 6.25 | +1.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMLV | SIXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | 1.40 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.87 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 1.05 | -0.51 |
Drawdowns
SMLV vs. SIXH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMLV drawdown since its inception was -42.45%, which is greater than SIXH's maximum drawdown of -11.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMLV and SIXH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMLV | SIXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.45% | -11.68% | -30.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.34% | -4.36% | -2.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.40% | -9.10% | -11.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.40% | -11.68% | -8.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.48% | -2.42% | +0.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.46% | -1.85% | -3.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.68% | 1.70% | +0.98% |
Volatility
SMLV vs. SIXH - Volatility Comparison
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) has a higher volatility of 3.98% compared to 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) at 2.31%. This indicates that SMLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIXH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMLV | SIXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.98% | 2.31% | +1.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.88% | 6.02% | +3.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.73% | 7.60% | +8.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.28% | 10.37% | +7.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.95% | 10.15% | +10.80% |
SMLV vs. SIXH - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMLV has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than SIXH's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMLV vs. SIXH - Dividend Comparison
SMLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, more than SIXH's 1.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIXH 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF | 1.90% | 2.23% | 1.55% | 2.04% | 2.06% | 1.65% | 1.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMLV SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | 2.35% | 2.74% | 2.68% | 2.68% | 2.40% | 2.12% | 2.47% | 2.62% | 3.15% | 7.92% | 3.04% | 2.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMLV and SIXH have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMLV has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to SIXH (2.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMLV dropped -42.45% vs SIXH's -11.68%.
On 5-year performance, SIXH leads with 8.95% vs 7.75% for SMLV. On fees, SMLV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, SIXH has been the lower-risk option at 2.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SIXH has performed better with a 8.95% return vs 7.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMLV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SIXH.
SMLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 1.90% for SIXH.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SMLV and 0.87% for SIXH.
SIXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMLV and SIXH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer