PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMLV vs. IDLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMLV vs. IDLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) and Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF (IDLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMLV achieves a 14.58% return, which is significantly higher than IDLV's 2.63% return. Over the past 10 years, SMLV has outperformed IDLV with an annualized return of 10.15%, while IDLV has yielded a comparatively lower 5.05% annualized return.


SMLV

1D
1.51%
1M
1.85%
YTD
14.58%
6M
14.63%
1Y
24.52%
3Y*
16.97%
5Y*
8.07%
10Y*
10.15%

IDLV

1D
0.27%
1M
-2.61%
YTD
2.63%
6M
4.87%
1Y
9.37%
3Y*
12.03%
5Y*
5.93%
10Y*
5.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMLV vs. IDLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMLV
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
14.58%5.66%16.77%7.52%-7.69%27.67%-1.55%24.10%-6.62%5.68%
IDLV
Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF
2.63%27.77%2.15%9.18%-12.21%9.76%-9.78%20.09%-8.02%22.01%

Correlation

The correlation between SMLV and IDLV is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2013

0.57

The correlation between SMLV and IDLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

SMLV vs. IDLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SMLV
IDLV

Financial Services

30.5%
22.9%

Industrials

14.3%
16.4%

Real Estate

12.2%
15.4%

Technology

11.2%
0.7%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
3.8%

Healthcare

8.7%
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
13.8%

Basic Materials

3.2%
2.3%

Utilities

2.9%
11.4%

Communication Services

2.2%
8.6%

Energy

1.8%
3.6%

Financial Services

SMLV
30.5%
IDLV
22.9%

Industrials

SMLV
14.3%
IDLV
16.4%

Real Estate

SMLV
12.2%
IDLV
15.4%

Technology

SMLV
11.2%
IDLV
0.7%

Consumer Cyclical

SMLV
8.7%
IDLV
3.8%

Healthcare

SMLV
8.7%
IDLV
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

SMLV
4.3%
IDLV
13.8%

Basic Materials

SMLV
3.2%
IDLV
2.3%

Utilities

SMLV
2.9%
IDLV
11.4%

Communication Services

SMLV
2.2%
IDLV
8.6%

Energy

SMLV
1.8%
IDLV
3.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMLV vs. IDLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMLV
SMLV Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SMLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMLV Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
SMLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMLV Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

IDLV
IDLV Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
IDLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDLV Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
IDLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMLV vs. IDLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) and Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF (IDLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMLVIDLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.18

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

1.25

+2.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.18

3.66

+5.53

SMLV vs. IDLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the IDLV Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMLV and IDLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMLVIDLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

0.96

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.51

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.38

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.45

+0.10

Drawdowns

SMLV vs. IDLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMLV drawdown since its inception was -42.45%, which is greater than IDLV's maximum drawdown of -34.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMLV and IDLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMLVIDLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.45%

-34.65%

-7.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.34%

-7.54%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.40%

-9.97%

-10.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.40%

-22.52%

+2.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.45%

-34.65%

-7.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.69%

+5.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.46%

-5.95%

+0.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

2.57%

+0.11%

Volatility

SMLV vs. IDLV - Volatility Comparison

SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) has a higher volatility of 4.12% compared to Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF (IDLV) at 2.51%. This indicates that SMLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMLVIDLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.12%

2.51%

+1.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.98%

7.65%

+2.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.75%

9.76%

+5.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.29%

11.79%

+6.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.95%

13.39%

+7.56%

SMLV vs. IDLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMLV has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IDLV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SMLV vs. IDLV - Dividend Comparison

SMLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than IDLV's 4.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDLV
Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF
4.69%4.63%3.41%3.59%4.69%2.99%2.30%4.92%3.94%3.05%3.92%3.93%
SMLV
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
2.31%2.74%2.68%2.68%2.40%2.12%2.47%2.62%3.15%7.92%3.04%2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMLV and IDLV have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMLV has higher volatility (4.12%) compared to IDLV (2.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMLV dropped -42.45% vs IDLV's -34.65%.

On 10-year performance, SMLV leads with 10.15% vs 5.05% for IDLV. On fees, SMLV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, IDLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SMLV has performed better with a 10.15% return vs 5.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMLV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IDLV.

IDLV has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 2.31% for SMLV.

SMLV tracks SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index, while IDLV tracks S&P BMI International Developed Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SMLV and 0.25% for IDLV.

SMLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMLV and IDLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer