SMLV vs. FBCG

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

SMLV (SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF) and FBCG (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMLV is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index, while FBCG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. SMLV is passively managed, while FBCG is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SMLV returned 8.66%/yr vs 14.46%/yr for FBCG. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMLV charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FBCG.

Performance

SMLV vs. FBCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMLV achieves a 18.33% return, which is significantly higher than FBCG's 11.31% return.

SMLV

• 1D: 0.75%
• 1M: 7.09%
• YTD: 18.33%
• 6M: 15.42%
• 1Y: 26.61%
• 3Y*: 16.39%
• 5Y*: 8.66%
• 10Y*: 10.74%

FBCG

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: -0.54%
• YTD: 11.31%
• 6M: 12.74%
• 1Y: 32.07%
• 3Y*: 28.04%
• 5Y*: 14.46%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMLV vs. FBCG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SMLV SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF	18.33%	5.66%	16.77%	7.52%	-7.69%	27.67%	24.55%
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	11.31%	18.60%	39.05%	57.98%	-39.10%	21.34%	41.44%

Correlation

The correlation between SMLV and FBCG is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020	0.50

The correlation between SMLV and FBCG shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SMLV vs. FBCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SMLV	FBCG
Financial Services	30.5%	2.2%
Industrials	14.3%	5.7%
Real Estate	12.2%	0.7%
Technology	11.2%	48.3%
Consumer Cyclical	8.7%	17.2%
Healthcare	8.7%	6.7%
Consumer Defensive	4.3%	1.3%
Basic Materials	3.2%	0.6%
Utilities	2.9%	0.5%
Communication Services	2.2%	16.6%
Energy	1.8%	0.4%

Return for Risk

SMLV vs. FBCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMLV

SMLV Risk / Return Rank: 63
SMLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
SMLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
SMLV Omega Ratio Rank: 58
SMLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
SMLV Martin Ratio Rank: 64

FBCG

FBCG Risk / Return Rank: 53
FBCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
FBCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
FBCG Omega Ratio Rank: 53
FBCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
FBCG Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMLV vs. FBCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SMLV	FBCG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	1.66	+0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	2.24	+0.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.29	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.64	2.12	+1.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.07	8.07	+2.00

SMLV vs. FBCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the FBCG Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMLV and FBCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SMLV vs. FBCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMLV drawdown since its inception was -42.45%, roughly equal to the maximum FBCG drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMLV and FBCG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMLV	FBCG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.45%	-43.56%	+1.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.34%	-15.17%	+7.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.40%	-27.89%	+7.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.40%	-43.56%	+23.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.45%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-4.71%	+4.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.45%	-11.45%	+6.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.66%	3.99%	-1.33%

Volatility

SMLV vs. FBCG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) is 3.80%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) has a volatility of 7.21%. This indicates that SMLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMLV	FBCG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.80%	7.21%	-3.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.81%	15.09%	-5.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.74%	19.38%	-3.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.29%	25.90%	-7.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.95%	25.77%	-4.82%

SMLV vs. FBCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMLV has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than FBCG's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMLV vs. FBCG - Dividend Comparison

SMLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, more than FBCG's 0.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	0.04%	0.05%	0.12%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SMLV SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF	2.24%	2.74%	2.68%	2.68%	2.40%	2.12%	2.47%	2.62%	3.15%	7.92%	3.04%	2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMLV and FBCG in my portfolio?

SMLV and FBCG have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SMLV or FBCG?

FBCG has higher volatility (7.21%) compared to SMLV (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMLV dropped -42.45% vs FBCG's -43.56%.

Which ETF is better, SMLV or FBCG?

On 5-year performance, FBCG leads with 14.46% vs 8.66% for SMLV. On fees, SMLV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, SMLV has been the lower-risk option at 3.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SMLV or FBCG?

Over the 5-year period, FBCG has performed better with a 14.46% return vs 8.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMLV or FBCG?

SMLV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FBCG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMLV or FBCG?

SMLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 0.04% for FBCG.

What is the main difference between SMLV and FBCG?

SMLV is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while FBCG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SMLV and 0.59% for FBCG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SMLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.