PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMLV vs. EELV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMLV vs. EELV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF (EELV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMLV achieves a 17.79% return, which is significantly higher than EELV's 4.67% return. Over the past 10 years, SMLV has outperformed EELV with an annualized return of 10.81%, while EELV has yielded a comparatively lower 6.88% annualized return.


SMLV

1D
0.79%
1M
3.94%
YTD
17.79%
6M
16.16%
1Y
26.57%
3Y*
17.93%
5Y*
8.90%
10Y*
10.81%

EELV

1D
-0.69%
1M
-0.11%
YTD
4.67%
6M
4.56%
1Y
15.36%
3Y*
11.19%
5Y*
7.47%
10Y*
6.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMLV vs. EELV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMLV
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
17.79%5.66%16.77%7.52%-7.69%27.67%-1.55%24.10%-6.62%5.68%
EELV
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF
4.67%21.97%1.90%8.85%-3.98%16.15%-3.89%8.89%-5.40%24.89%

Correlation

The correlation between SMLV and EELV is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2013

0.49

The correlation between SMLV and EELV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

SMLV vs. EELV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SMLV
EELV

Financial Services

30.4%
37.8%

Industrials

14.2%
8.9%

Real Estate

12.3%
2.6%

Technology

11.7%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
3.9%

Healthcare

8.7%
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
10.9%

Basic Materials

3.4%
5.1%

Utilities

2.8%
9.3%

Communication Services

2.2%
9.7%

Energy

1.6%
6.5%

Financial Services

SMLV
30.4%
EELV
37.8%

Industrials

SMLV
14.2%
EELV
8.9%

Real Estate

SMLV
12.3%
EELV
2.6%

Technology

SMLV
11.7%
EELV
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SMLV
8.9%
EELV
3.9%

Healthcare

SMLV
8.7%
EELV
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

SMLV
4.0%
EELV
10.9%

Basic Materials

SMLV
3.4%
EELV
5.1%

Utilities

SMLV
2.8%
EELV
9.3%

Communication Services

SMLV
2.2%
EELV
9.7%

Energy

SMLV
1.6%
EELV
6.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMLV vs. EELV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMLV
SMLV Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SMLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SMLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMLV Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

EELV
EELV Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
EELV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EELV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
EELV Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
EELV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
EELV Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMLV vs. EELV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF (EELV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMLVEELVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.25

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

1.88

+1.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.04

5.97

+4.07

SMLV vs. EELV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the EELV Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMLV and EELV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMLV vs. EELV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMLV drawdown since its inception was -42.45%, which is greater than EELV's maximum drawdown of -36.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMLV and EELV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMLVEELVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.45%

-36.35%

-6.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.34%

-8.22%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.40%

-11.79%

-8.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.40%

-19.04%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.45%

-36.35%

-6.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-4.07%

+3.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.44%

-8.91%

+3.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

2.58%

+0.07%

Volatility

SMLV vs. EELV - Volatility Comparison

SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF (EELV) have volatilities of 3.51% and 3.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMLVEELVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.51%

3.47%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.92%

9.28%

+0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.70%

11.11%

+4.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.26%

11.40%

+6.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.94%

13.53%

+7.41%

SMLV vs. EELV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMLV has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than EELV's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMLV vs. EELV - Dividend Comparison

SMLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than EELV's 3.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EELV
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF
3.93%3.75%4.70%4.00%3.45%4.35%2.82%3.14%5.50%2.92%2.29%2.53%
SMLV
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
2.31%2.74%2.68%2.68%2.40%2.12%2.47%2.62%3.15%7.92%3.04%2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMLV and EELV have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMLV has higher volatility (3.51%) compared to EELV (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMLV dropped -42.45% vs EELV's -36.35%.

On 10-year performance, SMLV leads with 10.81% vs 6.88% for EELV. On fees, SMLV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SMLV has performed better with a 10.81% return vs 6.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMLV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EELV.

EELV has the higher dividend yield at 3.93%, compared with 2.31% for SMLV.

SMLV tracks SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index, while EELV tracks S&P BMI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SMLV and 0.30% for EELV.

SMLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMLV and EELV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer