EELV vs. MINDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF (EELV) and Matthews India Fund (MINDX).
EELV is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P BMI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index. It was launched on Jan 13, 2012. MINDX is managed by Matthews Asia Funds. It was launched on Oct 30, 2005.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EELV or MINDX.
Key characteristics
| EELV | MINDX | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 1.36% | 5.42% |
| 1Y Return | 6.40% | 23.71% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 4.42% | 10.43% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 4.79% | 10.18% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 2.04% | 9.59% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.64 | 2.04 |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.61% | 12.14% |
| Max Drawdown | -36.35% | -72.18% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.27% | -2.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between EELV and MINDX is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
EELV vs. MINDX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, EELV achieves a 1.36% return, which is significantly lower than MINDX's 5.42% return. Over the past 10 years, EELV has underperformed MINDX with an annualized return of 2.04%, while MINDX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.59% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EELV vs. MINDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EELV has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than MINDX's 1.15% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EELV vs. MINDX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF (EELV) and Matthews India Fund (MINDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EELV vs. MINDX - Dividend Comparison
EELV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, more than MINDX's 2.91% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EELV Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF | 4.00% | 4.00% | 3.45% | 4.35% | 2.82% | 3.14% | 5.51% | 2.92% | 2.29% | 2.53% | 3.25% | 2.10% |
MINDX Matthews India Fund | 2.91% | 3.07% | 15.30% | 10.02% | 3.03% | 12.04% | 16.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.99% | 0.72% | 1.20% |
Drawdowns
EELV vs. MINDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EELV drawdown since its inception was -36.35%, smaller than the maximum MINDX drawdown of -72.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EELV and MINDX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EELV vs. MINDX - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF (EELV) has a higher volatility of 3.68% compared to Matthews India Fund (MINDX) at 3.17%. This indicates that EELV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.