PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EELV vs. EDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EELV vs. EDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF (EELV) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EELV achieves a 3.97% return, which is significantly lower than EDIV's 6.42% return. Over the past 10 years, EELV has underperformed EDIV with an annualized return of 6.56%, while EDIV has yielded a comparatively higher 9.16% annualized return.


EELV

1D
-0.84%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
3.97%
6M
5.13%
1Y
14.46%
3Y*
10.69%
5Y*
6.82%
10Y*
6.56%

EDIV

1D
-1.27%
1M
2.48%
YTD
6.42%
6M
7.80%
1Y
14.08%
3Y*
19.05%
5Y*
10.66%
10Y*
9.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EELV vs. EDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EELV
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF
3.97%21.97%1.90%8.85%-3.98%16.15%-3.89%8.89%-5.40%24.89%
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
6.42%16.45%12.75%41.91%-15.31%11.21%-9.95%11.80%-6.16%28.20%

Correlation

The correlation between EELV and EDIV is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2012

0.85

The correlation between EELV and EDIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

EELV vs. EDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EELV
EDIV

Financial Services

37.4%
29.7%

Consumer Defensive

10.8%
12.8%

Communication Services

9.6%
13.8%

Utilities

9.6%
2.5%

Industrials

8.9%
9.7%

Energy

6.5%
3.2%

Healthcare

5.4%
1.3%

Basic Materials

5.3%
1.7%

Consumer Cyclical

3.8%
11.8%

Real Estate

2.6%
5.1%

Technology

0.2%
8.4%

Financial Services

EELV
37.4%
EDIV
29.7%

Consumer Defensive

EELV
10.8%
EDIV
12.8%

Communication Services

EELV
9.6%
EDIV
13.8%

Utilities

EELV
9.6%
EDIV
2.5%

Industrials

EELV
8.9%
EDIV
9.7%

Energy

EELV
6.5%
EDIV
3.2%

Healthcare

EELV
5.4%
EDIV
1.3%

Basic Materials

EELV
5.3%
EDIV
1.7%

Consumer Cyclical

EELV
3.8%
EDIV
11.8%

Real Estate

EELV
2.6%
EDIV
5.1%

Technology

EELV
0.2%
EDIV
8.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EELV vs. EDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EELV
EELV Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
EELV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EELV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
EELV Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
EELV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
EELV Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

EDIV
EDIV Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
EDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
EDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EELV vs. EDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF (EELV) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EELVEDIVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.34

1.16

+0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.91

1.70

+0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.22

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

1.37

+0.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.99

4.23

+1.76

EELV vs. EDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EELV Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the EDIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EELV and EDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EELVEDIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

1.16

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.78

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.53

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.17

+0.13

Drawdowns

EELV vs. EDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EELV drawdown since its inception was -36.35%, smaller than the maximum EDIV drawdown of -53.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EELV and EDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EELVEDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.35%

-53.36%

+17.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.22%

-10.36%

+2.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.79%

-13.84%

+2.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.04%

-28.32%

+9.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.35%

-40.76%

+4.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.71%

-4.07%

-0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.93%

-19.36%

+10.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.42%

3.34%

-0.92%

Volatility

EELV vs. EDIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF (EELV) is 3.40%, while SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) has a volatility of 4.11%. This indicates that EELV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EELVEDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.40%

4.11%

-0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.03%

10.03%

-1.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.87%

12.19%

-1.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.36%

13.83%

-2.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.64%

17.49%

-3.85%

EELV vs. EDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EELV has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than EDIV's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

EELV vs. EDIV - Dividend Comparison

EELV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, less than EDIV's 4.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
4.50%4.69%3.94%4.26%4.94%3.84%3.52%3.83%3.41%2.99%4.94%5.33%
EELV
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF
3.60%3.75%4.70%4.00%3.45%4.35%2.82%3.14%5.50%2.92%2.29%2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


EELV and EDIV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EDIV has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to EELV (3.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EELV dropped -36.35% vs EDIV's -53.36%.

On 10-year performance, EDIV leads with 9.16% vs 6.56% for EELV. On fees, EELV is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, EELV has been the lower-risk option at 3.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EDIV has performed better with a 9.16% return vs 6.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EELV is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EDIV.

EDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 3.60% for EELV.

EELV is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while EDIV is Emerging Markets Equities. EELV tracks S&P BMI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index, while EDIV tracks S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EELV and 0.49% for EDIV.

EELV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EELV and EDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer