PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMLF vs. SPSM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMLF vs. SPSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (SMLF) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMLF achieves a 14.46% return, which is significantly lower than SPSM's 15.28% return. Over the past 10 years, SMLF has outperformed SPSM with an annualized return of 12.36%, while SPSM has yielded a comparatively lower 10.77% annualized return.


SMLF

1D
-0.72%
1M
4.07%
YTD
14.46%
6M
14.20%
1Y
30.98%
3Y*
19.85%
5Y*
10.89%
10Y*
12.36%

SPSM

1D
-0.92%
1M
1.62%
YTD
15.28%
6M
14.19%
1Y
31.50%
3Y*
14.42%
5Y*
5.71%
10Y*
10.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMLF vs. SPSM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMLF
iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF
14.46%12.30%16.33%19.99%-12.19%26.53%8.38%21.56%-8.42%12.70%
SPSM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF
15.28%6.11%8.55%16.11%-16.12%26.67%11.69%25.85%-11.17%15.44%

Correlation

The correlation between SMLF and SPSM is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2015

0.91

The correlation between SMLF and SPSM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

SMLF vs. SPSM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SMLF
SPSM

Industrials

19.8%
15.5%

Technology

16.6%
15.5%

Financial Services

15.0%
16.9%

Healthcare

12.7%
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

11.8%
13.4%

Real Estate

5.7%
7.7%

Energy

4.8%
5.9%

Basic Materials

4.6%
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
3.5%

Communication Services

3.2%
3.6%

Utilities

2.2%
2.0%

Industrials

SMLF
19.8%
SPSM
15.5%

Technology

SMLF
16.6%
SPSM
15.5%

Financial Services

SMLF
15.0%
SPSM
16.9%

Healthcare

SMLF
12.7%
SPSM
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SMLF
11.8%
SPSM
13.4%

Real Estate

SMLF
5.7%
SPSM
7.7%

Energy

SMLF
4.8%
SPSM
5.9%

Basic Materials

SMLF
4.6%
SPSM
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

SMLF
3.7%
SPSM
3.5%

Communication Services

SMLF
3.2%
SPSM
3.6%

Utilities

SMLF
2.2%
SPSM
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMLF vs. SPSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMLF
SMLF Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SMLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMLF Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SMLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMLF Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

SPSM
SPSM Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SPSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPSM Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SPSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPSM Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMLF vs. SPSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (SMLF) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMLFSPSMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.81

1.82

0.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.56

2.64

-0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.32

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.57

3.63

-0.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.27

12.14

+0.12

SMLF vs. SPSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMLF Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the SPSM Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMLF and SPSM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMLFSPSMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

1.82

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.27

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.47

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.45

+0.09

Drawdowns

SMLF vs. SPSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMLF drawdown since its inception was -41.89%, roughly equal to the maximum SPSM drawdown of -42.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMLF and SPSM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMLFSPSMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.89%

-42.89%

+1.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.71%

-8.72%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.28%

-27.94%

+1.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.28%

-27.94%

+1.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.89%

-42.89%

+1.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-0.97%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.60%

-7.93%

+1.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

2.60%

-0.07%

Volatility

SMLF vs. SPSM - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (SMLF) has a higher volatility of 4.80% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) at 4.44%. This indicates that SMLF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMLFSPSMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.80%

4.44%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.31%

11.64%

+0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.21%

17.47%

-0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.09%

21.43%

-0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.78%

22.99%

-1.21%

SMLF vs. SPSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMLF has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SPSM's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMLF vs. SPSM - Dividend Comparison

SMLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than SPSM's 1.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMLF
iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF
1.03%1.14%1.33%1.13%1.23%1.07%1.33%1.39%1.17%0.93%0.78%0.79%
SPSM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF
1.43%1.62%1.85%1.61%1.38%1.40%1.34%1.58%1.82%1.51%1.49%2.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, SMLF and SPSM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SMLF has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to SPSM (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMLF dropped -41.89% vs SPSM's -42.89%.

On 10-year performance, SMLF leads with 12.36% vs 10.77% for SPSM. On fees, SPSM is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, SPSM has been the lower-risk option at 4.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SMLF has performed better with a 12.36% return vs 10.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPSM is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SMLF.

SPSM has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 1.03% for SMLF.

SMLF tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Diversified Multi-Factor, while SPSM tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SMLF and 0.05% for SPSM.

SPSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMLF and SPSM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer