SMIG vs. VTWV
Compare and contrast key facts about Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV).
SMIG and VTWV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SMIG is an actively managed fund by Bahl & Gaynor. It was launched on Aug 25, 2021. VTWV is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Value Index. It was launched on Sep 20, 2010.
Performance
SMIG vs. VTWV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SMIG vs. VTWV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMIG Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF | 2.67% | 0.78% | 17.63% | 13.62% | -11.83% | 5.51% |
VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF | 5.55% | 12.72% | 7.83% | 14.67% | -14.46% | 4.76% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMIG achieves a 2.67% return, which is significantly lower than VTWV's 5.55% return.
SMIG
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -5.91%
- YTD
- 2.67%
- 6M
- 0.67%
- 1Y
- 4.18%
- 3Y*
- 10.28%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTWV
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -3.81%
- YTD
- 5.55%
- 6M
- 8.39%
- 1Y
- 28.79%
- 3Y*
- 13.98%
- 5Y*
- 5.59%
- 10Y*
- 9.64%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SMIG vs. VTWV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMIG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VTWV's 0.10% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SMIG vs. VTWV — Risk / Return Rank
SMIG
VTWV
SMIG vs. VTWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMIG | VTWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.26 | 1.30 | -1.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.49 | 1.88 | -1.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.25 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | 2.07 | -1.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.38 | 8.17 | -6.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMIG | VTWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 | 1.30 | -1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.46 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between SMIG and VTWV is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SMIG vs. VTWV - Dividend Comparison
SMIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, more than VTWV's 1.76% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMIG Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF | 1.85% | 1.82% | 1.75% | 1.91% | 2.00% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF | 1.76% | 1.79% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.07% | 1.60% | 1.49% | 1.82% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 1.57% | 2.03% |
Drawdowns
SMIG vs. VTWV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMIG drawdown since its inception was -19.65%, smaller than the maximum VTWV drawdown of -45.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMIG and VTWV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMIG | VTWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.65% | -45.73% | +26.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.92% | -13.90% | +1.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.76% | -4.82% | -1.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.72% | -7.89% | +1.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.69% | 3.53% | +0.16% |
Volatility
SMIG vs. VTWV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG) is 4.01%, while Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) has a volatility of 6.40%. This indicates that SMIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SMIG | VTWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.01% | 6.40% | -2.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.34% | 13.23% | -4.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.98% | 22.20% | -6.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.32% | 21.82% | -5.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.32% | 23.50% | -7.18% |