SMIG vs. SQLV

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG) and Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV).

SMIG and SQLV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SMIG is an actively managed fund by Bahl & Gaynor. It was launched on Aug 25, 2021. SQLV is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jul 12, 2017.

Performance

SMIG vs. SQLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG) and Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SMIG vs. SQLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SMIG Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF	2.39%	0.78%	17.63%	13.62%	-11.83%	5.51%
SQLV Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF	2.33%	2.50%	4.76%	21.21%	-12.86%	5.93%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SMIG having a 2.39% return and SQLV slightly lower at 2.33%.

SMIG

• 1D: 1.38%
• 1M: -6.05%
• YTD: 2.39%
• 6M: 0.02%
• 1Y: 4.80%
• 3Y*: 10.18%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SQLV

• 1D: 1.41%
• 1M: -3.07%
• YTD: 2.33%
• 6M: 3.74%
• 1Y: 17.85%
• 3Y*: 8.87%
• 5Y*: 5.25%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMIG vs. SQLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SMIG and SQLV have an expense ratio of 0.60%.

SMIG

Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF

SQLV

Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF

Return for Risk

SMIG vs. SQLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMIG

SMIG Risk / Return Rank: 21
SMIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
SMIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
SMIG Omega Ratio Rank: 20
SMIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
SMIG Martin Ratio Rank: 22

SQLV

SQLV Risk / Return Rank: 48
SQLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
SQLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
SQLV Omega Ratio Rank: 42
SQLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
SQLV Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMIG vs. SQLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG) and Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SMIG	SQLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.30	0.81	-0.51
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.54	1.29	-0.74
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.16	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.44	1.37	-0.93
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.44	4.69	-3.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SMIG vs. SQLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMIG Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the SQLV Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMIG and SQLV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SMIG	SQLV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30	0.81	-0.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.25	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.34	+0.01

Correlation

The correlation between SMIG and SQLV is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

SMIG vs. SQLV - Dividend Comparison

SMIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, more than SQLV's 1.11% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SMIG Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF	1.85%	1.82%	1.75%	1.91%	2.00%	0.50%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SQLV Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF	1.11%	1.15%	1.11%	1.09%	1.24%	1.12%	1.22%	1.20%	1.08%	0.40%

Drawdowns

SMIG vs. SQLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMIG drawdown since its inception was -19.65%, smaller than the maximum SQLV drawdown of -48.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMIG and SQLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMIG	SQLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.65%	-48.34%	+28.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.92%	-12.92%	+1.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.86%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.01%	-5.16%	-1.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.72%	-9.10%	+2.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.67%	3.79%	-0.12%

Volatility

SMIG vs. SQLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG) is 4.02%, while Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV) has a volatility of 5.25%. This indicates that SMIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMIG	SQLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.02%	5.25%	-1.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.36%	12.40%	-4.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.98%	22.07%	-6.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.33%	21.04%	-4.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.33%	23.50%	-7.17%