SMIG vs. OMFS
Compare and contrast key facts about Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG) and Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS).
SMIG and OMFS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SMIG is an actively managed fund by Bahl & Gaynor. It was launched on Aug 25, 2021. OMFS is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index. It was launched on Nov 8, 2017.
Performance
SMIG vs. OMFS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SMIG vs. OMFS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMIG Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF | 2.39% | 0.78% | 17.63% | 13.62% | -11.83% | 5.51% |
OMFS Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 2.13% | 13.34% | 3.98% | 15.12% | -17.29% | 6.89% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMIG achieves a 2.39% return, which is significantly higher than OMFS's 2.13% return.
SMIG
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- -6.05%
- YTD
- 2.39%
- 6M
- 0.02%
- 1Y
- 4.80%
- 3Y*
- 10.18%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OMFS
- 1D
- 2.76%
- 1M
- -4.36%
- YTD
- 2.13%
- 6M
- 3.49%
- 1Y
- 20.42%
- 3Y*
- 10.33%
- 5Y*
- 3.90%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SMIG vs. OMFS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMIG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than OMFS's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SMIG vs. OMFS — Risk / Return Rank
SMIG
OMFS
SMIG vs. OMFS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG) and Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMIG | OMFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.30 | 0.96 | -0.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.54 | 1.48 | -0.94 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.19 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.44 | 1.80 | -1.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.44 | 6.67 | -5.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMIG | OMFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 | 0.96 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.36 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between SMIG and OMFS is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SMIG vs. OMFS - Dividend Comparison
SMIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, more than OMFS's 1.02% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMIG Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF | 1.85% | 1.82% | 1.75% | 1.91% | 2.00% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OMFS Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 1.02% | 0.80% | 1.87% | 1.27% | 1.84% | 0.66% | 1.07% | 1.29% | 1.50% | 0.34% |
Drawdowns
SMIG vs. OMFS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMIG drawdown since its inception was -19.65%, smaller than the maximum OMFS drawdown of -42.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMIG and OMFS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMIG | OMFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.65% | -42.50% | +22.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.92% | -12.23% | +0.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.01% | -6.39% | -0.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.72% | -10.68% | +3.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.67% | 3.29% | +0.38% |
Volatility
SMIG vs. OMFS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG) is 4.02%, while Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) has a volatility of 6.48%. This indicates that SMIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OMFS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SMIG | OMFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.02% | 6.48% | -2.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.36% | 13.57% | -5.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.98% | 21.35% | -5.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.33% | 21.61% | -5.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.33% | 24.45% | -8.12% |