PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMICX vs. CONWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SMICX vs. CONWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Saratoga Moderately Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SMICX) and Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SMICX vs. CONWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SMICX
Saratoga Moderately Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio
-4.09%12.07%11.02%12.83%-9.82%11.85%9.22%16.62%-7.61%
CONWX
Concorde Wealth Management Fund
8.18%11.95%13.58%0.20%-2.51%19.73%8.76%16.84%-1.95%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMICX achieves a -4.09% return, which is significantly lower than CONWX's 8.18% return.


SMICX

1D
-0.38%
1M
-6.22%
YTD
-4.09%
6M
-2.60%
1Y
9.70%
3Y*
9.35%
5Y*
5.36%
10Y*

CONWX

1D
-0.62%
1M
-1.70%
YTD
8.18%
6M
11.51%
1Y
17.28%
3Y*
12.45%
5Y*
7.53%
10Y*
8.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SMICX vs. CONWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMICX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than CONWX's 1.41% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SMICX vs. CONWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMICX
SMICX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SMICX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMICX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMICX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
SMICX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMICX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

CONWX
CONWX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
CONWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CONWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
CONWX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
CONWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
CONWX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMICX vs. CONWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saratoga Moderately Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SMICX) and Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMICXCONWXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.93

1.70

-0.77

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.38

2.36

-0.98

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.37

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

1.99

-0.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.03

11.30

-6.27

SMICX vs. CONWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMICX Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the CONWX Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMICX and CONWX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMICXCONWXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

1.70

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.74

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.78

-0.26

Correlation

The correlation between SMICX and CONWX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SMICX vs. CONWX - Dividend Comparison

SMICX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.61%, more than CONWX's 3.41% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMICX
Saratoga Moderately Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio
11.61%11.14%4.00%0.87%7.81%11.59%1.39%3.45%2.95%0.00%
CONWX
Concorde Wealth Management Fund
3.41%3.69%10.55%2.16%7.85%3.63%3.86%2.16%5.09%2.48%

Drawdowns

SMICX vs. CONWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMICX drawdown since its inception was -22.85%, smaller than the maximum CONWX drawdown of -26.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMICX and CONWX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SMICXCONWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.85%

-26.09%

+3.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.85%

-8.60%

+1.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.24%

-12.49%

-1.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.64%

-2.03%

-4.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.44%

-2.78%

-0.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

1.52%

+0.19%

Volatility

SMICX vs. CONWX - Volatility Comparison

Saratoga Moderately Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SMICX) has a higher volatility of 3.40% compared to Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX) at 2.12%. This indicates that SMICX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CONWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SMICXCONWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.40%

2.12%

+1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.35%

5.43%

+0.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.62%

10.70%

-0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.76%

10.26%

-0.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.13%

11.15%

-0.02%