SMICX vs. SMBPX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SMICX (Saratoga Moderately Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio) and SMBPX (Saratoga Municipal Bond Portfolio) are both mutual funds - SMICX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Saratoga, while SMBPX is a Ultrashort Bond fund managed by Saratoga. Over the past 5 years, SMICX returned 6.77%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for SMBPX. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMICX charges 0.99%/yr vs 3.16%/yr for SMBPX.

Performance

SMICX vs. SMBPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Saratoga Moderately Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SMICX) and Saratoga Municipal Bond Portfolio (SMBPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SMICX

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: 2.66%
• YTD: 5.18%
• 6M: 5.15%
• 1Y: 14.21%
• 3Y*: 12.41%
• 5Y*: 6.77%
• 10Y*: —

SMBPX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: -0.11%
• 1Y: 3.99%
• 3Y*: 1.73%
• 5Y*: 0.17%
• 10Y*: -0.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMICX vs. SMBPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
SMICX Saratoga Moderately Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio	5.18%	12.07%	11.02%	12.83%	-9.82%	11.85%	9.22%	16.62%	-7.61%
SMBPX Saratoga Municipal Bond Portfolio	0.00%	2.92%	-0.11%	1.84%	-2.57%	-1.39%	0.77%	1.00%	-2.38%

Correlation

The correlation between SMICX and SMBPX is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2018	0.10

Return for Risk

SMICX vs. SMBPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMICX

SMICX Risk / Return Rank: 37
SMICX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
SMICX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
SMICX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
SMICX Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
SMICX Martin Ratio Rank: 44

SMBPX

SMBPX Risk / Return Rank: 93
SMBPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
SMBPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
SMBPX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
SMBPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
SMBPX Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMICX vs. SMBPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saratoga Moderately Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SMICX) and Saratoga Municipal Bond Portfolio (SMBPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SMICX	SMBPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	3.15	-1.42
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.52	6.26	-3.74
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	2.24	-0.93
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.22	6.47	-4.25
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.41	15.19	-5.78
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SMICX vs. SMBPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMICX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is lower than the SMBPX Sharpe Ratio of 3.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMICX and SMBPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SMICX	SMBPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.73	3.15	-1.42
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69	0.08	+0.61
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.08	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	0.88	-0.26

Drawdowns

SMICX vs. SMBPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMICX drawdown since its inception was -22.85%, which is greater than SMBPX's maximum drawdown of -9.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMICX and SMBPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMICX	SMBPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.85%	-9.99%	-12.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.64%	-0.69%	-5.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.42%	-4.48%	-6.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.24%	-6.52%	-7.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-9.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.99%	+2.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.39%	-2.47%	-0.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.56%	0.28%	+1.28%

Volatility

SMICX vs. SMBPX - Volatility Comparison

Saratoga Moderately Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SMICX) has a higher volatility of 2.65% compared to Saratoga Municipal Bond Portfolio (SMBPX) at 0.00%. This indicates that SMICX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMBPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMICX	SMBPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.65%	0.00%	+2.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.68%	0.39%	+6.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.51%	1.43%	+7.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.85%	2.20%	+7.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.11%	1.96%	+9.15%

SMICX vs. SMBPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMICX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than SMBPX's 3.16% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMICX vs. SMBPX - Dividend Comparison

SMICX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.59%, more than SMBPX's 2.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SMBPX Saratoga Municipal Bond Portfolio	2.69%	2.69%	1.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.04%	0.10%	0.10%	0.36%	0.23%	4.23%	1.50%
SMICX Saratoga Moderately Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio	10.59%	11.14%	4.00%	0.87%	7.81%	11.59%	1.39%	3.45%	2.95%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMICX and SMBPX in my portfolio?

SMICX and SMBPX have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SMICX or SMBPX?

SMICX has higher volatility (2.65%) compared to SMBPX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMICX dropped -22.85% vs SMBPX's -9.99%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SMBPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.