SMICX vs. SIBPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Saratoga Moderately Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SMICX) and Saratoga Investment Quality Bond Portfolio (SIBPX).
SMICX is managed by Saratoga. It was launched on Dec 28, 2017. SIBPX is managed by Saratoga. It was launched on Sep 1, 1994.
Performance
SMICX vs. SIBPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SMICX vs. SIBPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMICX Saratoga Moderately Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio | -4.09% | 12.07% | 11.02% | 12.83% | -9.82% | 11.85% | 9.22% | 16.62% | -7.61% |
SIBPX Saratoga Investment Quality Bond Portfolio | -1.04% | 6.50% | 0.78% | 2.90% | -2.51% | -1.73% | 3.34% | 3.84% | -0.72% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMICX achieves a -4.09% return, which is significantly lower than SIBPX's -1.04% return.
SMICX
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -6.22%
- YTD
- -4.09%
- 6M
- -2.60%
- 1Y
- 9.70%
- 3Y*
- 9.35%
- 5Y*
- 5.36%
- 10Y*
- —
SIBPX
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -2.37%
- YTD
- -1.04%
- 6M
- -0.33%
- 1Y
- 2.98%
- 3Y*
- 2.64%
- 5Y*
- 1.02%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SMICX vs. SIBPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMICX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than SIBPX's 1.54% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SMICX vs. SIBPX — Risk / Return Rank
SMICX
SIBPX
SMICX vs. SIBPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saratoga Moderately Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SMICX) and Saratoga Investment Quality Bond Portfolio (SIBPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMICX | SIBPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.93 | 0.72 | +0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.38 | 1.06 | +0.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.12 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | 1.27 | -0.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.03 | 4.06 | +0.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMICX | SIBPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | 0.72 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.31 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.45 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between SMICX and SIBPX is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SMICX vs. SIBPX - Dividend Comparison
SMICX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.61%, more than SIBPX's 2.20% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMICX Saratoga Moderately Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio | 11.61% | 11.14% | 4.00% | 0.87% | 7.81% | 11.59% | 1.39% | 3.45% | 2.95% | 0.00% |
SIBPX Saratoga Investment Quality Bond Portfolio | 2.20% | 2.24% | 2.31% | 1.54% | 0.14% | 1.39% | 0.58% | 0.99% | 1.21% | 1.03% |
Drawdowns
SMICX vs. SIBPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMICX drawdown since its inception was -22.85%, which is greater than SIBPX's maximum drawdown of -5.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMICX and SIBPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMICX | SIBPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.85% | -5.57% | -17.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.85% | -2.78% | -4.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.24% | -4.93% | -9.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.64% | -2.37% | -4.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.44% | -1.70% | -1.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.71% | 0.87% | +0.84% |
Volatility
SMICX vs. SIBPX - Volatility Comparison
Saratoga Moderately Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SMICX) has a higher volatility of 3.40% compared to Saratoga Investment Quality Bond Portfolio (SIBPX) at 1.60%. This indicates that SMICX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIBPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SMICX | SIBPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.40% | 1.60% | +1.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.35% | 2.61% | +3.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.62% | 4.30% | +6.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.76% | 3.29% | +6.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.13% | 2.72% | +8.41% |