PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CONWX vs. MACIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CONWX vs. MACIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX) and MFS Conservative Allocation Fund (MACIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CONWX achieves a 7.66% return, which is significantly higher than MACIX's 3.28% return. Over the past 10 years, CONWX has outperformed MACIX with an annualized return of 8.13%, while MACIX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.81% annualized return.


CONWX

1D
0.19%
1M
0.73%
6M
3.04%
YTD
7.66%
1Y
16.33%
3Y*
11.21%
5Y*
6.58%
10Y*
8.13%
ALL TIME*
8.52%

MACIX

1D
0.58%
1M
-0.11%
6M
1.90%
YTD
3.28%
1Y
7.29%
3Y*
7.69%
5Y*
3.35%
10Y*
5.81%
ALL TIME*
5.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CONWX vs. MACIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CONWX
Concorde Wealth Management Fund
7.66%11.95%13.58%0.20%-2.51%19.73%8.76%16.84%-1.95%7.17%
MACIX
MFS Conservative Allocation Fund
3.28%9.32%6.88%10.74%-13.30%8.15%11.88%17.36%-2.82%11.04%

Correlation

The correlation between CONWX and MACIX is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between CONWX and MACIX has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CONWX vs. MACIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CONWX
CONWX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
CONWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CONWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
CONWX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
CONWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
CONWX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

MACIX
MACIX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
MACIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MACIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
MACIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
MACIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
MACIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CONWX vs. MACIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX) and MFS Conservative Allocation Fund (MACIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CONWXMACIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.23

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

1.38

+2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.32

5.99

+2.33

CONWX vs. MACIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CONWX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the MACIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CONWX and MACIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CONWX vs. MACIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CONWX drawdown since its inception was -26.09%, roughly equal to the maximum MACIX drawdown of -25.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CONWX and MACIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CONWXMACIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.09%

-25.35%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.44%

-5.04%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.86%

-6.32%

-3.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.49%

-18.41%

+5.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.09%

-18.41%

-7.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.50%

-0.51%

-1.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.79%

-2.58%

-0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

1.16%

+0.67%

Volatility

CONWX vs. MACIX - Volatility Comparison

Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX) has a higher volatility of 1.88% compared to MFS Conservative Allocation Fund (MACIX) at 1.37%. This indicates that CONWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MACIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CONWXMACIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.88%

1.37%

+0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.07%

4.57%

+0.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.07%

5.53%

+1.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.15%

7.22%

+2.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.99%

7.13%

+3.86%

CONWX vs. MACIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CONWX has a 1.41% expense ratio, which is higher than MACIX's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

CONWX vs. MACIX - Dividend Comparison

CONWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, less than MACIX's 5.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CONWX
Concorde Wealth Management Fund
3.43%3.69%10.55%2.16%7.85%3.63%3.86%2.16%5.09%2.48%0.00%0.00%
MACIX
MFS Conservative Allocation Fund
5.88%6.07%7.08%3.47%3.61%3.89%3.01%3.65%5.14%4.60%2.76%1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


CONWX and MACIX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CONWX has higher volatility (1.88%) compared to MACIX (1.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CONWX dropped -26.09% vs MACIX's -25.35%.

CONWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CONWX and MACIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer