PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMICX vs. SBMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMICX vs. SBMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Saratoga Moderately Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SMICX) and Saratoga Moderate Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SBMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SMICX having a 4.73% return and SBMIX slightly higher at 4.78%.


SMICX

1D
-0.43%
1M
1.50%
YTD
4.73%
6M
4.44%
1Y
13.42%
3Y*
12.25%
5Y*
6.62%
10Y*

SBMIX

1D
-0.47%
1M
1.76%
YTD
4.78%
6M
4.45%
1Y
13.79%
3Y*
12.17%
5Y*
6.56%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMICX vs. SBMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SMICX
Saratoga Moderately Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio
4.73%12.07%11.02%12.83%-9.82%11.85%9.22%16.62%-7.97%
SBMIX
Saratoga Moderate Balanced Allocation Portfolio
4.78%12.25%11.36%11.96%-10.38%13.50%9.84%17.05%-6.88%

Correlation

The correlation between SMICX and SBMIX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2018

0.99

The correlation between SMICX and SBMIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMICX vs. SBMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMICX
SMICX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
SMICX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMICX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMICX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
SMICX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMICX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

SBMIX
SBMIX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
SBMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
SBMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMICX vs. SBMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saratoga Moderately Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SMICX) and Saratoga Moderate Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SBMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMICXSBMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.29

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

2.07

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.82

9.01

-0.19

SMICX vs. SBMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMICX Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the SBMIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMICX and SBMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMICXSBMIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

1.61

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.63

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.60

+0.01

Drawdowns

SMICX vs. SBMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMICX drawdown since its inception was -22.85%, roughly equal to the maximum SBMIX drawdown of -23.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMICX and SBMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMICXSBMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.85%

-23.97%

+1.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.64%

-6.85%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.42%

-12.14%

+0.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.24%

-14.92%

+0.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.43%

-0.47%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.39%

-3.48%

+0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.56%

1.57%

-0.01%

Volatility

SMICX vs. SBMIX - Volatility Comparison

Saratoga Moderately Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SMICX) and Saratoga Moderate Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SBMIX) have volatilities of 2.65% and 2.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMICXSBMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

2.63%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.69%

6.94%

-0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.52%

8.83%

-0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.86%

10.51%

-0.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.11%

11.90%

-0.79%

SMICX vs. SBMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SMICX and SBMIX have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

SMICX vs. SBMIX - Dividend Comparison

SMICX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.63%, more than SBMIX's 9.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
SBMIX
Saratoga Moderate Balanced Allocation Portfolio
9.66%10.12%3.70%1.32%5.93%8.04%1.35%3.40%3.11%
SMICX
Saratoga Moderately Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio
10.63%11.14%4.00%0.87%7.81%11.59%1.39%3.45%2.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, SMICX and SBMIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SMICX has higher volatility (2.65%) compared to SBMIX (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMICX dropped -22.85% vs SBMIX's -23.97%.

SMICX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMICX and SBMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer