PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMICX vs. AAAAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMICX vs. AAAAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Saratoga Moderately Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SMICX) and DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A (AAAAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMICX achieves a 4.91% return, which is significantly higher than AAAAX's 3.70% return.


SMICX

1D
-1.03%
1M
1.67%
YTD
4.91%
6M
3.96%
1Y
12.03%
3Y*
12.00%
5Y*
6.57%
10Y*

AAAAX

1D
-4.50%
1M
-7.71%
YTD
3.70%
6M
3.30%
1Y
8.58%
3Y*
9.33%
5Y*
3.86%
10Y*
6.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMICX vs. AAAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMICX
Saratoga Moderately Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio
4.91%12.07%11.02%12.83%-9.82%11.85%9.22%16.62%-7.61%0.00%
AAAAX
DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A
3.70%12.82%5.24%2.30%-9.91%23.45%3.71%21.42%-5.36%0.31%

Correlation

The correlation between SMICX and AAAAX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2017

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between SMICX and AAAAX has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMICX vs. AAAAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMICX
SMICX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
SMICX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMICX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMICX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
SMICX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMICX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

AAAAX
AAAAX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
AAAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
AAAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMICX vs. AAAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saratoga Moderately Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SMICX) and DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A (AAAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMICXAAAAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.16

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

0.97

+1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.21

4.63

+3.58

SMICX vs. AAAAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMICX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is higher than the AAAAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMICX and AAAAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMICX vs. AAAAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMICX drawdown since its inception was -22.85%, smaller than the maximum AAAAX drawdown of -40.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMICX and AAAAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMICXAAAAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.85%

-40.47%

+17.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.64%

-8.86%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.42%

-10.17%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.24%

-22.62%

+8.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

-8.86%

+7.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.37%

-6.84%

+3.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.58%

1.84%

-0.26%

Volatility

SMICX vs. AAAAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Saratoga Moderately Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SMICX) is 3.62%, while DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A (AAAAX) has a volatility of 5.11%. This indicates that SMICX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMICXAAAAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.62%

5.11%

-1.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.31%

8.78%

-1.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.07%

10.32%

-1.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.95%

12.25%

-2.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.14%

12.76%

-1.62%

SMICX vs. AAAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMICX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than AAAAX's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMICX vs. AAAAX - Dividend Comparison

SMICX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.62%, more than AAAAX's 1.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAAAX
DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A
1.56%3.54%2.45%2.08%4.17%2.31%1.33%1.81%1.61%1.52%1.47%2.15%
SMICX
Saratoga Moderately Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio
10.62%11.14%4.00%0.87%7.81%11.59%1.39%3.45%2.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMICX and AAAAX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AAAAX has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to SMICX (3.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMICX dropped -22.85% vs AAAAX's -40.47%.

SMICX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMICX and AAAAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer