AAAAX vs. SCGSX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

AAAAX (DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A) and SCGSX (DWS Capital Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - AAAAX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by DWS, while SCGSX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by DWS. Over the past 10 years, AAAAX returned 6.87%/yr vs 15.92%/yr for SCGSX. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AAAAX charges 1.22%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for SCGSX.

Performance

AAAAX vs. SCGSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A (AAAAX) and DWS Capital Growth Fund (SCGSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAAAX achieves a 8.20% return, which is significantly higher than SCGSX's 4.40% return. Over the past 10 years, AAAAX has underperformed SCGSX with an annualized return of 6.87%, while SCGSX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.92% annualized return.

AAAAX

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: -3.72%
• YTD: 8.20%
• 6M: 8.62%
• 1Y: 13.59%
• 3Y*: 9.70%
• 5Y*: 5.18%
• 10Y*: 6.87%

SCGSX

• 1D: 1.91%
• 1M: 0.62%
• YTD: 4.40%
• 6M: 4.19%
• 1Y: 15.25%
• 3Y*: 18.08%
• 5Y*: 9.89%
• 10Y*: 15.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAAAX vs. SCGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AAAAX DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A	8.20%	12.82%	5.24%	2.30%	-9.91%	23.45%	3.71%	21.42%	-5.36%	14.67%
SCGSX DWS Capital Growth Fund	4.40%	12.34%	26.27%	38.61%	-30.88%	22.41%	38.60%	36.98%	-1.96%	26.27%

Correlation

The correlation between AAAAX and SCGSX is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.34
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2007	0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between AAAAX and SCGSX has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

AAAAX vs. SCGSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAAAX

AAAAX Risk / Return Rank: 34
AAAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
AAAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
AAAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 30
AAAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
AAAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 38

SCGSX

SCGSX Risk / Return Rank: 11
SCGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
SCGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
SCGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 12
SCGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
SCGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAAAX vs. SCGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A (AAAAX) and DWS Capital Growth Fund (SCGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AAAAX	SCGSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.47	0.87	+0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.01	1.27	+0.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.16	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.40	0.81	+1.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.83	2.58	+5.25

AAAAX vs. SCGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAAAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is higher than the SCGSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAAAX and SCGSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AAAAX vs. SCGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAAAX drawdown since its inception was -40.47%, smaller than the maximum SCGSX drawdown of -50.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAAAX and SCGSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAAAX	SCGSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.47%	-50.63%	+10.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.68%	-18.09%	+12.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.17%	-21.75%	+11.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.62%	-35.81%	+13.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.41%	-35.81%	+6.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.92%	-3.25%	-1.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.84%	-12.78%	+5.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.73%	5.66%	-3.93%

Volatility

AAAAX vs. SCGSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A (AAAAX) is 2.50%, while DWS Capital Growth Fund (SCGSX) has a volatility of 7.22%. This indicates that AAAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AAAAX	SCGSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.50%	7.22%	-4.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.49%	13.74%	-6.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.25%	16.80%	-7.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.10%	20.99%	-8.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.70%	20.58%	-7.88%

AAAAX vs. SCGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAAAX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than SCGSX's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAAAX vs. SCGSX - Dividend Comparison

AAAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, less than SCGSX's 7.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AAAAX DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A	3.27%	3.54%	2.45%	2.08%	4.17%	2.31%	1.33%	1.81%	1.61%	1.52%	1.47%	2.15%
SCGSX DWS Capital Growth Fund	7.30%	7.62%	9.06%	7.18%	7.81%	6.64%	5.59%	5.98%	17.00%	9.08%	8.49%	11.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAAAX and SCGSX in my portfolio?

AAAAX and SCGSX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AAAAX or SCGSX?

SCGSX has higher volatility (7.22%) compared to AAAAX (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAAAX dropped -40.47% vs SCGSX's -50.63%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AAAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.