SMHC vs. ASHR

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

SMHC (VanEck China Semiconductor ETF) and ASHR (Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF) are both China Equities funds - SMHC tracks the MarketVector China Semiconductor 25 Index while ASHR tracks the CSI 300 Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.65% expense ratio.

Performance

SMHC vs. ASHR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck China Semiconductor ETF (SMHC) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF (ASHR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SMHC

• 1D: -6.17%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ASHR

• 1D: -2.66%
• 1M: -6.38%
• 6M: 0.21%
• YTD: 2.37%
• 1Y: 21.25%
• 3Y*: 9.58%
• 5Y*: -1.74%
• 10Y*: 4.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMHC vs. ASHR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SMHC VanEck China Semiconductor ETF	-15.04%
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF	-6.74%

Correlation

The correlation between SMHC and ASHR is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2026	0.91

Return for Risk

SMHC vs. ASHR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMHC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ASHR

ASHR Risk / Return Rank: 43
ASHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
ASHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
ASHR Omega Ratio Rank: 36
ASHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
ASHR Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMHC vs. ASHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck China Semiconductor ETF (SMHC) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF (ASHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SMHC	ASHR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.10	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.61	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.20	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.17	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.14	—

Drawdowns

SMHC vs. ASHR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMHC drawdown since its inception was -24.16%, smaller than the maximum ASHR drawdown of -51.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMHC and ASHR.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMHC	ASHR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.16%	-51.30%	+27.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.84%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-33.12%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-44.10%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-51.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.16%	-21.56%	-2.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.02%	-29.06%	+20.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.98%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SMHC	ASHR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	9.39%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	14.93%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	80.83%	19.46%	+61.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	80.83%	24.17%	+56.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	80.83%	24.18%	+56.65%

SMHC vs. ASHR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SMHC and ASHR have an expense ratio of 0.65%.

Dividends

SMHC vs. ASHR - Dividend Comparison

SMHC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF	2.25%	2.31%	1.13%	2.48%	1.13%	0.88%	0.81%	0.98%	1.32%	0.84%	0.73%	30.13%
SMHC VanEck China Semiconductor ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMHC and ASHR in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, SMHC and ASHR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, SMHC or ASHR?

Both ETFs have the same 0.65% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMHC or ASHR?

SMHC and ASHR have the same expense ratio: 0.65% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMHC or ASHR?

ASHR has the higher dividend yield at 2.25%, compared with 0.00% for SMHC.

What is the main difference between SMHC and ASHR?

SMHC tracks MarketVector China Semiconductor 25 Index, while ASHR tracks CSI 300 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and DWS.