PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMH vs. NOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMH vs. NOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and ServiceNow, Inc (NOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMH achieves a 72.29% return, which is significantly higher than NOW's -30.94% return. Over the past 10 years, SMH has outperformed NOW with an annualized return of 37.45%, while NOW has yielded a comparatively lower 23.10% annualized return.


SMH

1D
-5.40%
1M
2.08%
YTD
72.29%
6M
72.29%
1Y
125.63%
3Y*
60.45%
5Y*
37.54%
10Y*
37.45%

NOW

1D
6.57%
1M
-22.13%
YTD
-30.94%
6M
-30.94%
1Y
-47.72%
3Y*
-2.00%
5Y*
-0.84%
10Y*
23.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMH vs. NOW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
72.29%49.17%39.10%73.38%-33.53%42.13%55.53%64.45%-9.05%38.48%
NOW
ServiceNow, Inc
-30.94%-27.75%50.05%81.96%-40.18%17.93%94.97%58.56%36.55%75.40%

Correlation

The correlation between SMH and NOW is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2012

0.48

The correlation between SMH and NOW shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.51 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMH vs. NOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

NOW
NOW Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
NOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOW Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
NOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOW Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMH vs. NOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and ServiceNow, Inc (NOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMHNOWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

0.84

+0.68

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.46

-0.79

+9.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

29.95

-1.33

+31.28

SMH vs. NOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMH Sharpe Ratio is 3.53, which is higher than the NOW Sharpe Ratio of -0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMH and NOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMH vs. NOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMH drawdown since its inception was -84.96%, which is greater than NOW's maximum drawdown of -64.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH and NOW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMHNOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.96%

-64.54%

-20.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.93%

-60.28%

+45.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.74%

-64.54%

+28.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.30%

-64.54%

+19.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.30%

-64.54%

+19.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.24%

-54.80%

+47.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.98%

-13.94%

-27.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.21%

35.95%

-31.74%

Volatility

SMH vs. NOW - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and ServiceNow, Inc (NOW) have volatilities of 20.63% and 20.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMHNOWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.63%

20.08%

+0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.45%

47.66%

-17.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.83%

52.19%

-16.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.02%

43.92%

-7.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.05%

40.94%

-7.89%

Dividends

SMH vs. NOW - Dividend Comparison

SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, while NOW has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOW
ServiceNow, Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
0.18%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMH and NOW have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMH has higher volatility (20.63%) compared to NOW (20.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMH dropped -84.96% vs NOW's -64.54%.

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.53 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMH and NOW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer