PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMDX vs. OUSM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMDX vs. OUSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Intech S&P Small-Mid Cap Diversified Alpha ETF (SMDX) and OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMDX achieves a 13.72% return, which is significantly higher than OUSM's 6.80% return.


SMDX

1D
-0.32%
1M
2.07%
YTD
13.72%
6M
13.55%
1Y
28.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OUSM

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.69%
YTD
6.80%
6M
6.94%
1Y
10.89%
3Y*
11.71%
5Y*
7.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMDX vs. OUSM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SMDX and OUSM is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2025

0.84

The correlation between SMDX and OUSM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMDX vs. OUSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMDX
SMDX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
SMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

OUSM
OUSM Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
OUSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OUSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
OUSM Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
OUSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
OUSM Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMDX vs. OUSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intech S&P Small-Mid Cap Diversified Alpha ETF (SMDX) and OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMDXOUSMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.15

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.28

1.19

+2.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.40

3.47

+7.93

SMDX vs. OUSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is higher than the OUSM Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMDX and OUSM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMDXOUSMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

0.83

+0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

0.48

+0.62

Drawdowns

SMDX vs. OUSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMDX drawdown since its inception was -14.52%, smaller than the maximum OUSM drawdown of -39.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMDX and OUSM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMDXOUSMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.52%

-39.84%

+25.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.66%

-9.21%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

-1.67%

+1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.39%

-5.22%

+2.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

3.14%

-0.65%

Volatility

SMDX vs. OUSM - Volatility Comparison

Intech S&P Small-Mid Cap Diversified Alpha ETF (SMDX) has a higher volatility of 4.26% compared to OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) at 3.66%. This indicates that SMDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OUSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMDXOUSMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.26%

3.66%

+0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.50%

9.25%

+2.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.56%

13.15%

+3.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.19%

16.30%

+4.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.19%

18.94%

+2.25%

SMDX vs. OUSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMDX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than OUSM's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMDX vs. OUSM - Dividend Comparison

SMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than OUSM's 2.07% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
OUSM
OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF
2.07%2.09%1.62%1.64%1.98%1.55%2.02%1.99%2.63%2.17%
SMDX
Intech S&P Small-Mid Cap Diversified Alpha ETF
0.53%0.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMDX and OUSM have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMDX has higher volatility (4.26%) compared to OUSM (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMDX dropped -14.52% vs OUSM's -39.84%.

On 1-year performance, SMDX leads with 28.25% vs 10.89% for OUSM. On fees, SMDX is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, OUSM has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SMDX has performed better with a 28.25% return vs 10.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMDX is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for OUSM.

OUSM has the higher dividend yield at 2.07%, compared with 0.53% for SMDX.

They also come from different issuers: Intech and O'Shares Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMDX and 0.48% for OUSM.

SMDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMDX and OUSM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer