SMDX vs. OUSM
SMDX (Intech S&P Small-Mid Cap Diversified Alpha ETF) and OUSM (OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. SMDX is actively managed, while OUSM is passively managed. Over the past year, SMDX returned 28.25% vs 10.89% for OUSM. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SMDX charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for OUSM.
Performance
SMDX vs. OUSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMDX achieves a 13.72% return, which is significantly higher than OUSM's 6.80% return.
SMDX
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- YTD
- 13.72%
- 6M
- 13.55%
- 1Y
- 28.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OUSM
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- YTD
- 6.80%
- 6M
- 6.94%
- 1Y
- 10.89%
- 3Y*
- 11.71%
- 5Y*
- 7.39%
- 10Y*
- —
SMDX vs. OUSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SMDX Intech S&P Small-Mid Cap Diversified Alpha ETF | 13.72% | 14.21% |
OUSM OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF | 6.80% | 2.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMDX and OUSM is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2025 | 0.84 |
The correlation between SMDX and OUSM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMDX vs. OUSM — Risk / Return Rank
SMDX
OUSM
SMDX vs. OUSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intech S&P Small-Mid Cap Diversified Alpha ETF (SMDX) and OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMDX | OUSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.15 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.28 | 1.19 | +2.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.40 | 3.47 | +7.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMDX | OUSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.72 | 0.83 | +0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | 0.48 | +0.62 |
Drawdowns
SMDX vs. OUSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMDX drawdown since its inception was -14.52%, smaller than the maximum OUSM drawdown of -39.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMDX and OUSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMDX | OUSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.52% | -39.84% | +25.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.66% | -9.21% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.56% | -1.67% | +1.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.39% | -5.22% | +2.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | 3.14% | -0.65% |
Volatility
SMDX vs. OUSM - Volatility Comparison
Intech S&P Small-Mid Cap Diversified Alpha ETF (SMDX) has a higher volatility of 4.26% compared to OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) at 3.66%. This indicates that SMDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OUSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMDX | OUSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.26% | 3.66% | +0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.50% | 9.25% | +2.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.56% | 13.15% | +3.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.19% | 16.30% | +4.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.19% | 18.94% | +2.25% |
SMDX vs. OUSM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMDX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than OUSM's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMDX vs. OUSM - Dividend Comparison
SMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than OUSM's 2.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OUSM OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF | 2.07% | 2.09% | 1.62% | 1.64% | 1.98% | 1.55% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.63% | 2.17% |
SMDX Intech S&P Small-Mid Cap Diversified Alpha ETF | 0.53% | 0.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMDX and OUSM have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMDX has higher volatility (4.26%) compared to OUSM (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMDX dropped -14.52% vs OUSM's -39.84%.
On 1-year performance, SMDX leads with 28.25% vs 10.89% for OUSM. On fees, SMDX is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, OUSM has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SMDX has performed better with a 28.25% return vs 10.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMDX is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for OUSM.
OUSM has the higher dividend yield at 2.07%, compared with 0.53% for SMDX.
They also come from different issuers: Intech and O'Shares Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMDX and 0.48% for OUSM.
SMDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMDX and OUSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer