PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMDX vs. SMDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMDX vs. SMDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Intech S&P Small-Mid Cap Diversified Alpha ETF (SMDX) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMDX achieves a 16.32% return, which is significantly lower than SMDV's 18.11% return.


SMDX

1D
-0.19%
1M
-0.58%
6M
11.52%
YTD
16.32%
1Y
27.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
22.36%

SMDV

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.26%
6M
10.74%
YTD
18.11%
1Y
23.79%
3Y*
10.63%
5Y*
6.99%
10Y*
7.53%
ALL TIME*
8.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.61M$5.90M$3.47M
$1.21K$3.64K$6.44K

SMDX vs. SMDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SMDX and SMDV is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2025

0.76

The correlation between SMDX and SMDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMDX vs. SMDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SMDX
SMDX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
SMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

SMDV
SMDV Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SMDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMDV Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
SMDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMDV Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SMDX vs. SMDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intech S&P Small-Mid Cap Diversified Alpha ETF (SMDX) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMDXSMDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.26

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

2.30

+0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.11

7.27

+2.85

SMDX vs. SMDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the SMDV Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMDX and SMDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMDX vs. SMDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMDX drawdown since its inception was -14.52%, smaller than the maximum SMDV drawdown of -34.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMDX and SMDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMDXSMDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.52%

-34.12%

+19.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.66%

-9.79%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.17%

-2.36%

+0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.26%

-5.87%

+3.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

3.09%

-0.61%

Volatility

SMDX vs. SMDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Intech S&P Small-Mid Cap Diversified Alpha ETF (SMDX) is 3.53%, while ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that SMDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMDXSMDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.53%

4.40%

-0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.68%

10.24%

+1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.20%

15.45%

+0.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.44%

18.56%

+1.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.44%

20.75%

-0.31%

SMDX vs. SMDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMDX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SMDV's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMDX vs. SMDV - Dividend Comparison

SMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than SMDV's 2.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMDV
ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF
2.29%2.67%2.68%2.69%2.51%2.02%2.13%2.03%1.97%1.84%1.35%1.81%
SMDX
Intech S&P Small-Mid Cap Diversified Alpha ETF
0.52%0.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMDX and SMDV have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMDV has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to SMDX (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMDX dropped -14.52% vs SMDV's -34.12%.

On 1-year performance, SMDX leads with 27.07% vs 23.79% for SMDV. On fees, SMDX is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SMDX has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SMDX has performed better with a 27.07% return vs 23.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMDX is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SMDV.

SMDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.29%, compared with 0.52% for SMDX.

They also come from different issuers: Intech and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMDX and 0.40% for SMDV.

SMDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMDX and SMDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer