PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMCZ vs. MSTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMCZ vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF (SMCZ) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMCZ achieves a -87.76% return, which is significantly lower than MSTZ's -32.77% return.


SMCZ

1D
-1.52%
1M
-31.27%
6M
-85.93%
YTD
-87.76%
1Y
-73.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-89.95%

MSTZ

1D
-3.35%
1M
3.78%
6M
-35.30%
YTD
-32.77%
1Y
150.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-86.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$99.07M$124.74M$178.48M
$23.07M$12.69M$14.60M

SMCZ vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SMCZ and MSTZ is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2025

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMCZ vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SMCZ
SMCZ Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
SMCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
SMCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTZ
MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SMCZ vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF (SMCZ) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMCZMSTZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.26

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.80

1.78

-2.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.47

3.30

-4.78

SMCZ vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMCZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is lower than the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMCZ and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMCZ vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMCZ drawdown since its inception was -97.40%, roughly equal to the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCZ and MSTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMCZMSTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.40%

-99.38%

+1.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-91.49%

-84.89%

-6.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.42%

-97.71%

+1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-77.91%

-94.63%

+16.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

49.58%

45.77%

+3.81%

Volatility

SMCZ vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF (SMCZ) has a higher volatility of 65.84% compared to T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) at 33.58%. This indicates that SMCZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMCZMSTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

65.84%

33.58%

+32.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

160.74%

134.23%

+26.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

178.69%

149.52%

+29.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

175.68%

169.71%

+5.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

175.68%

169.71%

+5.97%

SMCZ vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMCZ has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMCZ vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

SMCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.59%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


SMCZ and MSTZ have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMCZ has higher volatility (65.84%) compared to MSTZ (33.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMCZ dropped -97.40% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 150.38% vs -73.11% for SMCZ. On fees, MSTZ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, MSTZ has been the lower-risk option at 33.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 150.38% return vs -73.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MSTZ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for SMCZ.

SMCZ has the higher dividend yield at 16.59%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and REX. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for SMCZ and 1.05% for MSTZ.

MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMCZ and MSTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer