PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMCZ vs. AIVC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMCZ vs. AIVC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF (SMCZ) and Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMCZ achieves a -87.55% return, which is significantly lower than AIVC's 66.45% return.


SMCZ

1D
12.25%
1M
-36.38%
YTD
-87.55%
6M
-86.35%
1Y
-87.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AIVC

1D
-4.78%
1M
7.56%
YTD
66.45%
6M
65.87%
1Y
125.43%
3Y*
48.25%
5Y*
16.85%
10Y*
16.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMCZ vs. AIVC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SMCZ and AIVC is -0.65, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2025

-0.66

The correlation between SMCZ and AIVC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.66 to -0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMCZ vs. AIVC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMCZ
SMCZ Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
SMCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
SMCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

AIVC
AIVC Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
AIVC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIVC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIVC Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
AIVC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIVC Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMCZ vs. AIVC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF (SMCZ) and Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMCZAIVCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.55

-0.61

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.96

8.94

-9.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.95

27.60

-29.55

SMCZ vs. AIVC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMCZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the AIVC Sharpe Ratio of 3.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMCZ and AIVC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMCZ vs. AIVC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMCZ drawdown since its inception was -97.40%, which is greater than AIVC's maximum drawdown of -56.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCZ and AIVC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMCZAIVCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.40%

-56.11%

-41.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-91.49%

-14.11%

-77.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.36%

-8.48%

-87.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-76.32%

-16.38%

-59.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

46.98%

4.56%

+42.42%

Volatility

SMCZ vs. AIVC - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF (SMCZ) has a higher volatility of 85.47% compared to Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC) at 15.81%. This indicates that SMCZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AIVC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMCZAIVCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

85.47%

15.81%

+69.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

149.88%

26.60%

+123.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

173.51%

32.28%

+141.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

174.65%

30.73%

+143.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

174.65%

27.16%

+147.49%

SMCZ vs. AIVC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMCZ has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than AIVC's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMCZ vs. AIVC - Dividend Comparison

SMCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.31%, more than AIVC's 0.10% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AIVC
Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF
0.10%0.17%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.39%1.16%0.38%0.92%0.64%
SMCZ
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF
16.31%2.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMCZ and AIVC have a correlation of -0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMCZ has higher volatility (85.47%) compared to AIVC (15.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMCZ dropped -97.40% vs AIVC's -56.11%.

On 1-year performance, AIVC leads with 125.43% vs -87.72% for SMCZ. On fees, AIVC is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, AIVC has been the lower-risk option at 15.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AIVC has performed better with a 125.43% return vs -87.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AIVC is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for SMCZ.

SMCZ has the higher dividend yield at 16.31%, compared with 0.10% for AIVC.

SMCZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while AIVC is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for SMCZ and 0.59% for AIVC.

AIVC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.91 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMCZ and AIVC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer