SMCZ vs. AIVC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SMCZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF) and AIVC (Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMCZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while AIVC is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg AI Value Chain Index. SMCZ is actively managed, while AIVC is passively managed. Over the past year, SMCZ returned -89.94% vs 151.70% for AIVC. At a correlation of -0.65, they often move in opposite directions. SMCZ charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for AIVC.

Performance

SMCZ vs. AIVC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF (SMCZ) and Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMCZ achieves a -90.14% return, which is significantly lower than AIVC's 79.45% return.

SMCZ

• 1D: 10.93%
• 1M: -77.87%
• YTD: -90.14%
• 6M: -87.78%
• 1Y: -89.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AIVC

• 1D: -1.33%
• 1M: 30.74%
• YTD: 79.45%
• 6M: 79.35%
• 1Y: 151.70%
• 3Y*: 51.42%
• 5Y*: 20.46%
• 10Y*: 17.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMCZ vs. AIVC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SMCZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF	-90.14%	-61.04%
AIVC Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF	79.45%	56.48%

Correlation

The correlation between SMCZ and AIVC is -0.63, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025	-0.65

The correlation between SMCZ and AIVC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.65 to -0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SMCZ vs. AIVC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMCZ

SMCZ Risk / Return Rank: 2
SMCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
SMCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
SMCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3
SMCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
SMCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 0

AIVC

AIVC Risk / Return Rank: 96
AIVC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
AIVC Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
AIVC Omega Ratio Rank: 94
AIVC Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
AIVC Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMCZ vs. AIVC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF (SMCZ) and Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SMCZ	AIVC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.57	5.14	-5.72
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.94	5.21	-6.15
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.88	1.69	-0.81
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.98	10.82	-11.80
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-2.00	36.63	-38.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SMCZ vs. AIVC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMCZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.57, which is lower than the AIVC Sharpe Ratio of 5.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMCZ and AIVC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SMCZ	AIVC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.57	5.14	-5.72
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.68	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.64	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.58	0.64	-1.22

Drawdowns

SMCZ vs. AIVC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMCZ drawdown since its inception was -97.40%, which is greater than AIVC's maximum drawdown of -56.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCZ and AIVC.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMCZ	AIVC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.40%	-56.11%	-41.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-91.74%	-14.11%	-77.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-32.55%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-53.58%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-56.11%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-97.12%	-1.33%	-95.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-75.71%	-16.43%	-59.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	44.99%	4.16%	+40.83%

Volatility

SMCZ vs. AIVC - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF (SMCZ) has a higher volatility of 80.07% compared to Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC) at 11.07%. This indicates that SMCZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AIVC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMCZ	AIVC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	80.07%	11.07%	+69.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	131.65%	23.72%	+107.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	156.87%	29.71%	+127.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	163.39%	30.20%	+133.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	163.39%	26.93%	+136.46%

SMCZ vs. AIVC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMCZ has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than AIVC's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMCZ vs. AIVC - Dividend Comparison

SMCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.59%, more than AIVC's 0.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
AIVC Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF	0.10%	0.17%	0.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.39%	1.16%	0.38%	0.92%	0.64%
SMCZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF	20.59%	2.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMCZ and AIVC in my portfolio?

SMCZ and AIVC have a correlation of -0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SMCZ or AIVC?

SMCZ has higher volatility (80.07%) compared to AIVC (11.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMCZ dropped -97.40% vs AIVC's -56.11%.

Which ETF is better, SMCZ or AIVC?

On 1-year performance, AIVC leads with 151.70% vs -89.94% for SMCZ. On fees, AIVC is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, AIVC has been the lower-risk option at 11.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SMCZ or AIVC?

Over the 1-year period, AIVC has performed better with a 151.70% return vs -89.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMCZ or AIVC?

AIVC is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for SMCZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMCZ or AIVC?

SMCZ has the higher dividend yield at 20.59%, compared with 0.10% for AIVC.

What is the main difference between SMCZ and AIVC?

SMCZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while AIVC is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for SMCZ and 0.59% for AIVC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AIVC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.14 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.