SMCZ vs. AIFD
SMCZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF) and AIFD (TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMCZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while AIFD is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by TCW. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SMCZ returned -87.72% vs 79.52% for AIFD. At a correlation of -0.63, they often move in opposite directions. SMCZ charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AIFD.
Performance
SMCZ vs. AIFD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMCZ achieves a -87.55% return, which is significantly lower than AIFD's 39.56% return.
SMCZ
- 1D
- 12.25%
- 1M
- -36.38%
- YTD
- -87.55%
- 6M
- -86.35%
- 1Y
- -87.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIFD
- 1D
- -4.95%
- 1M
- 2.31%
- YTD
- 39.56%
- 6M
- 37.82%
- 1Y
- 79.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMCZ vs. AIFD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SMCZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF | -87.55% | -62.31% |
AIFD TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF | 39.56% | 57.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMCZ and AIFD is -0.61, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2025 | -0.63 |
The correlation between SMCZ and AIFD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.63 to -0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMCZ vs. AIFD — Risk / Return Rank
SMCZ
AIFD
SMCZ vs. AIFD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF (SMCZ) and TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF (AIFD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMCZ | AIFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.45 | -0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.96 | 6.80 | -7.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.95 | 25.05 | -27.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMCZ vs. AIFD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMCZ drawdown since its inception was -97.40%, which is greater than AIFD's maximum drawdown of -33.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCZ and AIFD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMCZ | AIFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.40% | -33.20% | -64.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -91.49% | -11.75% | -79.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.36% | -8.46% | -87.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -76.32% | -5.73% | -70.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 46.98% | 3.19% | +43.79% |
Volatility
SMCZ vs. AIFD - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF (SMCZ) has a higher volatility of 85.47% compared to TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF (AIFD) at 13.42%. This indicates that SMCZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AIFD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMCZ | AIFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 85.47% | 13.42% | +72.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 149.88% | 22.17% | +127.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 173.51% | 27.76% | +145.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 174.65% | 29.99% | +144.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 174.65% | 29.99% | +144.66% |
SMCZ vs. AIFD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMCZ has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than AIFD's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMCZ vs. AIFD - Dividend Comparison
SMCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.31%, while AIFD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AIFD TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMCZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF | 16.31% | 2.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMCZ and AIFD have a correlation of -0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMCZ has higher volatility (85.47%) compared to AIFD (13.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMCZ dropped -97.40% vs AIFD's -33.20%.
On 1-year performance, AIFD leads with 79.52% vs -87.72% for SMCZ. On fees, AIFD is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, AIFD has been the lower-risk option at 13.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AIFD has performed better with a 79.52% return vs -87.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AIFD is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for SMCZ.
SMCZ has the higher dividend yield at 16.31%, compared with 0.00% for AIFD.
SMCZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while AIFD is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and TCW. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for SMCZ and 0.75% for AIFD.
AIFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMCZ and AIFD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer