PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMCIX vs. FASGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMCIX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Shelton Capital Management S&P Smallcap Index Fund (SMCIX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMCIX achieves a 16.24% return, which is significantly higher than FASGX's 11.93% return. Over the past 10 years, SMCIX has outperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 11.15%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.01% annualized return.


SMCIX

1D
0.91%
1M
2.79%
YTD
16.24%
6M
15.02%
1Y
31.79%
3Y*
18.11%
5Y*
7.75%
10Y*
11.15%

FASGX

1D
0.51%
1M
4.40%
YTD
11.93%
6M
12.90%
1Y
26.54%
3Y*
16.47%
5Y*
8.47%
10Y*
10.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMCIX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMCIX
Shelton Capital Management S&P Smallcap Index Fund
16.24%6.90%18.13%15.48%-16.41%26.53%11.27%30.68%-9.07%3.08%
FASGX
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund
11.93%18.23%10.81%16.45%-16.83%13.98%17.19%22.81%-7.65%17.34%

Correlation

The correlation between SMCIX and FASGX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1997

0.83

The correlation between SMCIX and FASGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMCIX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMCIX
SMCIX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SMCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
SMCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

FASGX
FASGX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FASGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FASGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FASGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FASGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FASGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMCIX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Shelton Capital Management S&P Smallcap Index Fund (SMCIX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMCIXFASGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.95

2.61

-0.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.81

3.64

-0.82

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.49

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.88

3.39

+0.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.92

14.98

-2.05

SMCIX vs. FASGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMCIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the FASGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMCIX and FASGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMCIXFASGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95

2.61

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.69

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.79

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.63

-0.22

Drawdowns

SMCIX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMCIX drawdown since its inception was -58.13%, which is greater than FASGX's maximum drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCIX and FASGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMCIXFASGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.13%

-47.35%

-10.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.79%

-7.95%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.52%

-12.80%

-13.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.72%

-23.54%

-3.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.54%

-27.20%

-15.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

0.00%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.53%

-6.71%

-2.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

1.79%

+0.84%

Volatility

SMCIX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison

Shelton Capital Management S&P Smallcap Index Fund (SMCIX) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) at 3.30%. This indicates that SMCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMCIXFASGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

3.30%

+1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.70%

8.39%

+3.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.52%

10.34%

+7.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.86%

12.27%

+9.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.63%

12.65%

+10.98%

SMCIX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMCIX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMCIX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison

SMCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.04%, more than FASGX's 6.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FASGX
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund
6.55%7.33%4.60%1.72%6.69%2.73%2.20%5.19%6.31%2.75%0.20%5.58%
SMCIX
Shelton Capital Management S&P Smallcap Index Fund
8.04%10.78%19.88%3.48%10.40%9.40%4.53%13.88%9.39%1.63%4.64%11.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMCIX and FASGX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMCIX has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to FASGX (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMCIX dropped -58.13% vs FASGX's -47.35%.

FASGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMCIX and FASGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer