SMCIX vs. QQQI

In the year-to-date period, SMCIX achieves a -8.43% return, which is significantly lower than QQQI's 2.07% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

SMCIX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Shelton Capital Management S&P Smallcap Index Fund (SMCIX) and NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current SMCIX Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the QQQI Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMCIX and QQQI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

SMCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.44%, less than QQQI's 14.55% yield.

The maximum SMCIX drawdown since its inception was -58.13%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCIX and QQQI.

Shelton Capital Management S&P Smallcap Index Fund (SMCIX) has a higher volatility of 6.52% compared to NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF (QQQI) at 3.90%. This indicates that SMCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.