SMC vs. NBIS
SMC (Summit Midstream Corp) and NBIS (Nebius Group N.V.) are both stocks. SMC operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy), while NBIS operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past year, SMC returned 13.91% vs 575.29% for NBIS. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SMC vs. NBIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMC achieves a 9.56% return, which is significantly lower than NBIS's 200.67% return.
SMC
- 1D
- -1.75%
- 1M
- -8.57%
- YTD
- 9.56%
- 6M
- 13.29%
- 1Y
- 13.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NBIS
- 1D
- -3.42%
- 1M
- 42.66%
- YTD
- 200.67%
- 6M
- 154.43%
- 1Y
- 575.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMC vs. NBIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SMC Summit Midstream Corp | 9.56% | -29.38% | 5.71% |
NBIS Nebius Group N.V. | 200.67% | 202.18% | 46.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMC and NBIS is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2024 | 0.18 |
The correlation between SMC and NBIS shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SMC:
$360.38M
NBIS:
$77.76B
SMC:
-$0.16
NBIS:
$3.17
SMC:
0.63
NBIS:
75.53
SMC:
0.68
NBIS:
10.74
SMC:
$568.54M
NBIS:
$877.90M
SMC:
$280.71M
NBIS:
$420.60M
SMC:
$144.92M
NBIS:
-$52.78M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMC vs. NBIS — Risk / Return Rank
SMC
NBIS
SMC vs. NBIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Summit Midstream Corp (SMC) and Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMC | NBIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.31 | 5.52 | -5.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.74 | 4.59 | -3.85 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.51 | -0.41 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.52 | 12.77 | -12.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.30 | 29.34 | -28.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMC | NBIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 | 5.52 | -5.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.32 | 3.62 | -3.95 |
Drawdowns
SMC vs. NBIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMC drawdown since its inception was -57.33%, roughly equal to the maximum NBIS drawdown of -58.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMC and NBIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMC | NBIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.33% | -58.27% | +0.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.13% | -45.47% | +18.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.35% | -4.85% | -30.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.28% | -19.07% | -10.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.73% | 19.74% | -9.01% |
Volatility
SMC vs. NBIS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Summit Midstream Corp (SMC) is 16.88%, while Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) has a volatility of 31.82%. This indicates that SMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NBIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMC | NBIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.88% | 31.82% | -14.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.13% | 70.20% | -45.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.76% | 105.12% | -59.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.22% | 110.56% | -65.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.22% | 110.56% | -65.34% |
Dividends
SMC vs. NBIS - Dividend Comparison
Neither SMC nor NBIS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
SMC vs. NBIS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Summit Midstream Corp and Nebius Group N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
SMC and NBIS have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NBIS has higher volatility (31.82%) compared to SMC (16.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMC dropped -57.33% vs NBIS's -58.27%.
NBIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.52 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMC and NBIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer