SLYV vs. VWO
SLYV (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF) and VWO (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLYV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while VWO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE Emerging Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SLYV returned 10.53%/yr vs 8.88%/yr for VWO. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SLYV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for VWO.
Performance
SLYV vs. VWO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLYV achieves a 18.18% return, which is significantly higher than VWO's 9.93% return. Over the past 10 years, SLYV has outperformed VWO with an annualized return of 10.53%, while VWO has yielded a comparatively lower 8.88% annualized return.
SLYV
- 1D
- 1.81%
- 1M
- 5.47%
- YTD
- 18.18%
- 6M
- 14.15%
- 1Y
- 36.99%
- 3Y*
- 14.26%
- 5Y*
- 6.05%
- 10Y*
- 10.53%
VWO
- 1D
- 2.39%
- 1M
- -0.49%
- YTD
- 9.93%
- 6M
- 10.69%
- 1Y
- 23.70%
- 3Y*
- 16.63%
- 5Y*
- 4.87%
- 10Y*
- 8.88%
SLYV vs. VWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 18.18% | 6.54% | 7.28% | 14.82% | -11.08% | 30.57% | 2.68% | 24.26% | -12.77% | 11.74% |
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 9.93% | 25.60% | 10.59% | 9.25% | -17.98% | 1.26% | 15.17% | 20.75% | -14.76% | 31.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLYV and VWO is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2005 | 0.64 |
The correlation between SLYV and VWO shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (3 years) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SLYV vs. VWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SLYV
VWO
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Technology
Real Estate
Energy
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
SLYV
VWO
Consumer Cyclical
SLYV
VWO
Industrials
SLYV
VWO
Technology
SLYV
VWO
Real Estate
SLYV
VWO
Energy
SLYV
VWO
Healthcare
SLYV
VWO
Basic Materials
SLYV
VWO
Communication Services
SLYV
VWO
Consumer Defensive
SLYV
VWO
Utilities
SLYV
VWO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLYV vs. VWO — Risk / Return Rank
SLYV
VWO
SLYV vs. VWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLYV | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.27 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.97 | 2.13 | +1.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.17 | 7.51 | +5.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLYV vs. VWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLYV drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, smaller than the maximum VWO drawdown of -67.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYV and VWO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLYV | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.15% | -67.68% | +6.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -11.17% | +1.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.68% | -17.37% | -11.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.68% | -32.60% | +3.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.73% | -36.39% | -11.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.42% | +3.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.94% | -15.81% | +6.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | 3.16% | -0.34% |
Volatility
SLYV vs. VWO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) is 4.80%, while Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) has a volatility of 6.66%. This indicates that SLYV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLYV | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.80% | 6.66% | -1.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.74% | 14.04% | -2.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.30% | 16.53% | +1.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 17.48% | +4.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.96% | 19.23% | +4.73% |
SLYV vs. VWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLYV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VWO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SLYV vs. VWO - Dividend Comparison
SLYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than VWO's 2.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 1.77% | 2.02% | 2.30% | 2.11% | 1.47% | 1.94% | 1.40% | 1.67% | 2.14% | 5.53% | 2.18% | 6.55% |
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 2.45% | 2.79% | 3.20% | 3.52% | 4.11% | 2.63% | 1.91% | 3.23% | 2.88% | 2.30% | 2.52% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLYV and VWO have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VWO has higher volatility (6.66%) compared to SLYV (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYV dropped -61.15% vs VWO's -67.68%.
On 10-year performance, SLYV leads with 10.53% vs 8.88% for VWO. On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, SLYV has been the lower-risk option at 4.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLYV has performed better with a 10.53% return vs 8.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SLYV.
VWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.45%, compared with 1.77% for SLYV.
SLYV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while VWO is Emerging Markets Equities. SLYV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SLYV and 0.08% for VWO.
SLYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLYV and VWO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer