PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLYV vs. VIOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLYV vs. VIOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF (VIOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SLYV having a 21.58% return and VIOO slightly higher at 22.49%. Over the past 10 years, SLYV has underperformed VIOO with an annualized return of 10.21%, while VIOO has yielded a comparatively higher 10.83% annualized return.


SLYV

1D
0.96%
1M
3.09%
6M
15.21%
YTD
21.58%
1Y
36.29%
3Y*
13.57%
5Y*
8.65%
10Y*
10.21%
ALL TIME*
10.79%

VIOO

1D
1.04%
1M
2.36%
6M
16.21%
YTD
22.49%
1Y
33.09%
3Y*
14.26%
5Y*
8.11%
10Y*
10.83%
ALL TIME*
12.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLYV vs. VIOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
21.58%6.54%7.28%14.82%-11.08%30.57%2.68%24.26%-12.77%11.74%
VIOO
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF
22.49%6.04%8.48%16.16%-16.26%26.79%11.47%22.68%-8.65%13.16%

Correlation

The correlation between SLYV and VIOO is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.95

The correlation between SLYV and VIOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

SLYV vs. VIOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SLYV
VIOO

Financial Services

21.2%
17.1%

Consumer Cyclical

14.3%
13.2%

Industrials

12.4%
15.6%

Technology

12.2%
15.6%

Real Estate

8.1%
7.6%

Healthcare

7.8%
12.2%

Energy

7.5%
4.9%

Basic Materials

5.8%
4.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
4.2%

Communication Services

3.8%
3.2%

Utilities

1.8%
1.8%

Financial Services

SLYV
21.2%
VIOO
17.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SLYV
14.3%
VIOO
13.2%

Industrials

SLYV
12.4%
VIOO
15.6%

Technology

SLYV
12.2%
VIOO
15.6%

Real Estate

SLYV
8.1%
VIOO
7.6%

Healthcare

SLYV
7.8%
VIOO
12.2%

Energy

SLYV
7.5%
VIOO
4.9%

Basic Materials

SLYV
5.8%
VIOO
4.7%

Consumer Defensive

SLYV
5.0%
VIOO
4.2%

Communication Services

SLYV
3.8%
VIOO
3.2%

Utilities

SLYV
1.8%
VIOO
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLYV vs. VIOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLYV
SLYV Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SLYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLYV Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SLYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLYV Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

VIOO
VIOO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
VIOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
VIOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLYV vs. VIOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF (VIOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SLYVVIOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.33

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.89

3.79

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.97

12.74

+0.23

SLYV vs. VIOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLYV Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the VIOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLYV and VIOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SLYV vs. VIOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLYV drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, which is greater than VIOO's maximum drawdown of -44.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYV and VIOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLYVVIOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.15%

-44.15%

-17.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.36%

-8.77%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.68%

-27.93%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.68%

-27.93%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.73%

-44.15%

-3.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-1.18%

+0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.90%

-7.28%

-1.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

2.60%

+0.21%

Volatility

SLYV vs. VIOO - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF (VIOO) have volatilities of 3.58% and 3.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLYVVIOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.58%

3.49%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.61%

12.06%

-0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.87%

17.46%

+0.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.73%

21.27%

+0.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.90%

22.94%

+0.96%

SLYV vs. VIOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLYV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VIOO's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SLYV vs. VIOO - Dividend Comparison

SLYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than VIOO's 1.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
1.80%2.02%2.30%2.11%1.47%1.94%1.40%1.67%2.14%5.53%2.18%6.55%
VIOO
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF
1.11%1.36%1.48%1.47%1.51%1.16%1.09%1.37%1.32%1.11%1.06%1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, SLYV and VIOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SLYV has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to VIOO (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYV dropped -61.15% vs VIOO's -44.15%.

On 10-year performance, VIOO leads with 10.83% vs 10.21% for SLYV. On fees, VIOO is cheaper at 0.07% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VIOO has performed better with a 10.83% return vs 10.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VIOO is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SLYV.

SLYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 1.11% for VIOO.

SLYV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while VIOO is Small Cap Blend Equities. SLYV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while VIOO tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SLYV and 0.07% for VIOO.

SLYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLYV and VIOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer