PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLYV vs. SPYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLYV vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLYV achieves a 17.46% return, which is significantly higher than SPYM's 8.21% return. Over the past 10 years, SLYV has underperformed SPYM with an annualized return of 10.61%, while SPYM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.61% annualized return.


SLYV

1D
-0.21%
1M
2.91%
YTD
17.46%
6M
15.89%
1Y
37.37%
3Y*
15.39%
5Y*
6.20%
10Y*
10.61%

SPYM

1D
-1.44%
1M
-1.32%
YTD
8.21%
6M
7.24%
1Y
23.73%
3Y*
20.77%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
15.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLYV vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
17.46%6.54%7.28%14.82%-11.08%30.57%2.68%24.26%-12.77%11.74%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
8.21%17.79%25.00%26.24%-18.09%28.78%18.49%31.99%-4.78%21.30%

Correlation

The correlation between SLYV and SPYM is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2005

0.72

The correlation between SLYV and SPYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

SLYV vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SLYV
SPYM

Financial Services

19.5%
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

15.4%
9.4%

Technology

13.4%
38.0%

Industrials

11.6%
8.0%

Real Estate

8.6%
1.8%

Healthcare

7.3%
8.5%

Energy

7.0%
3.1%

Basic Materials

6.9%
1.8%

Communication Services

4.4%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
4.6%

Utilities

2.1%
2.6%

Financial Services

SLYV
19.5%
SPYM
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SLYV
15.4%
SPYM
9.4%

Technology

SLYV
13.4%
SPYM
38.0%

Industrials

SLYV
11.6%
SPYM
8.0%

Real Estate

SLYV
8.6%
SPYM
1.8%

Healthcare

SLYV
7.3%
SPYM
8.5%

Energy

SLYV
7.0%
SPYM
3.1%

Basic Materials

SLYV
6.9%
SPYM
1.8%

Communication Services

SLYV
4.4%
SPYM
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

SLYV
3.8%
SPYM
4.6%

Utilities

SLYV
2.1%
SPYM
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLYV vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLYV
SLYV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SLYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLYV Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SLYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLYV Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYM
SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLYV vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SLYVSPYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.35

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.01

2.68

+1.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.30

11.98

+1.32

SLYV vs. SPYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLYV Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the SPYM Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLYV and SPYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SLYV vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLYV drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, which is greater than SPYM's maximum drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYV and SPYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLYVSPYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.15%

-54.46%

-6.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.36%

-8.90%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.68%

-18.72%

-9.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.68%

-24.48%

-4.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.73%

-33.87%

-13.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.68%

-3.14%

+1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.93%

-7.14%

-1.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

1.99%

+0.83%

Volatility

SLYV vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) have volatilities of 4.76% and 4.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLYVSPYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.76%

4.83%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.74%

9.83%

+1.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.28%

12.46%

+5.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.91%

16.90%

+5.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.94%

18.03%

+5.91%

SLYV vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLYV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SLYV vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison

SLYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, more than SPYM's 1.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
1.87%2.02%2.30%2.11%1.47%1.94%1.40%1.67%2.14%5.53%2.18%6.55%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
1.30%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.79%2.23%1.75%1.97%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


SLYV and SPYM have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPYM has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to SLYV (4.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYV dropped -61.15% vs SPYM's -54.46%.

On 10-year performance, SPYM leads with 15.61% vs 10.61% for SLYV. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 15.61% return vs 10.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SLYV.

SLYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 1.30% for SPYM.

SLYV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while SPYM is S&P 500. SLYV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SLYV and 0.02% for SPYM.

SLYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLYV and SPYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer