SLYV vs. SPEM
SLYV (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF) and SPEM (SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLYV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while SPEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the S&P Emerging Markets BMI. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SLYV returned 10.65%/yr vs 9.63%/yr for SPEM. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SLYV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for SPEM.
Performance
SLYV vs. SPEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLYV achieves a 19.47% return, which is significantly higher than SPEM's 11.32% return. Over the past 10 years, SLYV has outperformed SPEM with an annualized return of 10.65%, while SPEM has yielded a comparatively lower 9.63% annualized return.
SLYV
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 6.39%
- YTD
- 19.47%
- 6M
- 16.63%
- 1Y
- 41.92%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 6.28%
- 10Y*
- 10.65%
SPEM
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- YTD
- 11.32%
- 6M
- 13.11%
- 1Y
- 27.73%
- 3Y*
- 17.37%
- 5Y*
- 5.60%
- 10Y*
- 9.63%
SLYV vs. SPEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 19.47% | 6.54% | 7.28% | 14.82% | -11.08% | 30.57% | 2.68% | 24.26% | -12.77% | 11.74% |
SPEM SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF | 11.32% | 25.63% | 11.40% | 10.51% | -17.90% | 1.51% | 14.55% | 19.69% | -13.26% | 34.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLYV and SPEM is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2007 | 0.64 |
The correlation between SLYV and SPEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
SLYV vs. SPEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SLYV
SPEM
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Industrials
Real Estate
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
SLYV
SPEM
Consumer Cyclical
SLYV
SPEM
Technology
SLYV
SPEM
Industrials
SLYV
SPEM
Real Estate
SLYV
SPEM
Healthcare
SLYV
SPEM
Energy
SLYV
SPEM
Basic Materials
SLYV
SPEM
Communication Services
SLYV
SPEM
Consumer Defensive
SLYV
SPEM
Utilities
SLYV
SPEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLYV vs. SPEM — Risk / Return Rank
SLYV
SPEM
SLYV vs. SPEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLYV | SPEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.29 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.20 | 2.28 | +1.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.96 | 8.16 | +5.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLYV vs. SPEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLYV drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, smaller than the maximum SPEM drawdown of -64.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYV and SPEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLYV | SPEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.15% | -64.41% | +3.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -11.36% | +2.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.68% | -17.62% | -11.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.68% | -31.75% | +3.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.73% | -36.06% | -11.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.40% | +2.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.93% | -14.73% | +5.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | 3.17% | -0.35% |
Volatility
SLYV vs. SPEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) is 4.81%, while SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) has a volatility of 6.87%. This indicates that SLYV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLYV | SPEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.81% | 6.87% | -2.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.59% | 14.21% | -2.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.31% | 16.67% | +1.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 17.26% | +4.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.96% | 18.83% | +5.13% |
SLYV vs. SPEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLYV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPEM's 0.11% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SLYV vs. SPEM - Dividend Comparison
SLYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than SPEM's 2.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 1.75% | 2.02% | 2.30% | 2.11% | 1.47% | 1.94% | 1.40% | 1.67% | 2.14% | 5.53% | 2.18% | 6.55% |
SPEM SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF | 2.49% | 2.77% | 2.78% | 2.80% | 3.38% | 3.14% | 1.92% | 2.94% | 2.34% | 1.12% | 1.51% | 2.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLYV and SPEM have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPEM has higher volatility (6.87%) compared to SLYV (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYV dropped -61.15% vs SPEM's -64.41%.
On 10-year performance, SLYV leads with 10.65% vs 9.63% for SPEM. On fees, SPEM is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, SLYV has been the lower-risk option at 4.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLYV has performed better with a 10.65% return vs 9.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPEM is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SLYV.
SPEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 1.75% for SLYV.
SLYV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while SPEM is Emerging Markets Equities. SLYV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while SPEM tracks S&P Emerging Markets BMI. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SLYV and 0.11% for SPEM.
SLYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLYV and SPEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer