SLYV vs. SCHA
SLYV (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF) and SCHA (Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLYV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while SCHA is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SLYV returned 10.21%/yr vs 10.91%/yr for SCHA. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SLYV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHA.
Performance
SLYV vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SLYV having a 21.58% return and SCHA slightly higher at 22.07%. Over the past 10 years, SLYV has underperformed SCHA with an annualized return of 10.21%, while SCHA has yielded a comparatively higher 10.91% annualized return.
SLYV
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 3.09%
- 6M
- 15.21%
- YTD
- 21.58%
- 1Y
- 36.29%
- 3Y*
- 13.57%
- 5Y*
- 8.65%
- 10Y*
- 10.21%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.79%
SCHA
- 1D
- 2.21%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- 6M
- 15.12%
- YTD
- 22.07%
- 1Y
- 34.95%
- 3Y*
- 16.78%
- 5Y*
- 8.24%
- 10Y*
- 10.91%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.59%
SLYV vs. SCHA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 21.58% | 6.54% | 7.28% | 14.82% | -11.08% | 30.57% | 2.68% | 24.26% | -12.77% | 11.74% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 22.07% | 11.60% | 11.16% | 18.46% | -19.81% | 16.45% | 19.34% | 26.50% | -11.79% | 14.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLYV and SCHA is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009 | 0.94 |
The correlation between SLYV and SCHA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
SLYV vs. SCHA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SLYV
SCHA
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Technology
Real Estate
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Financial Services
SLYV
SCHA
Consumer Cyclical
SLYV
SCHA
Industrials
SLYV
SCHA
Technology
SLYV
SCHA
Real Estate
SLYV
SCHA
Healthcare
SLYV
SCHA
Energy
SLYV
SCHA
Basic Materials
SLYV
SCHA
Consumer Defensive
SLYV
SCHA
Communication Services
SLYV
SCHA
Utilities
SLYV
SCHA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLYV vs. SCHA — Risk / Return Rank
SLYV
SCHA
SLYV vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLYV | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.31 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.89 | 3.69 | +0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.97 | 12.60 | +0.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLYV vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLYV drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, which is greater than SCHA's maximum drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYV and SCHA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLYV | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.15% | -42.41% | -18.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -9.50% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.68% | -27.29% | -1.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.68% | -30.79% | +2.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.73% | -42.41% | -5.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.54% | -4.18% | +3.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.90% | -7.54% | -1.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.81% | 2.78% | +0.03% |
Volatility
SLYV vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) is 3.58%, while Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) has a volatility of 5.84%. This indicates that SLYV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLYV | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.58% | 5.84% | -2.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.61% | 14.56% | -2.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.87% | 19.05% | -1.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.73% | 22.03% | -0.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.90% | 22.75% | +1.15% |
SLYV vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLYV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHA's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SLYV vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison
SLYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than SCHA's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 1.03% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.42% | 1.37% | 1.19% | 1.05% | 1.39% | 1.58% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 1.80% | 2.02% | 2.30% | 2.11% | 1.47% | 1.94% | 1.40% | 1.67% | 2.14% | 5.53% | 2.18% | 6.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLYV and SCHA have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHA has higher volatility (5.84%) compared to SLYV (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYV dropped -61.15% vs SCHA's -42.41%.
On 10-year performance, SCHA leads with 10.91% vs 10.21% for SLYV. On fees, SCHA is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SLYV has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHA has performed better with a 10.91% return vs 10.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHA is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SLYV.
SLYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 1.03% for SCHA.
SLYV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while SCHA is Small Cap Blend Equities. SLYV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while SCHA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SLYV and 0.04% for SCHA.
SLYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLYV and SCHA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer